SUAS HISTÓRIAS: narrativas de mulheres usuárias de um CRAS na cidade de Santos
Data
2021-12-17
Tipo
Dissertação de mestrado
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Resumo
A assistência social foi afirmada, na Constituição Federal de 1988, como um direito social e se constituiu como política nacional em 2004, com a criação do SUAS. A efetivação desse direito, porém, tem sido atravessada pelas características históricas do Brasil, como a acentuada desigualdade social, o racismo estrutural e a cultura do assistencialismo. O presente trabalho é o resultado de uma pesquisa qualitativa, do tipo pesquisa-intervenção, que teve como objetivo compreender quais as reverberações da política de assistência social na vida das usuárias de um CRAS no município de Santos-SP. Foram realizadas entrevistas narrativas com cinco usuárias do CRAS Nova Cintra. A análise foi realizada com base em quatro categorias, elaboradas a partir das narrativas: 1. Território; 2. Mulheres; 3. Raça e 4. Relação com o SUAS. Os resultados apontam para o Programa Bolsa Família e o Cadastro Único como portas de entrada para o reconhecimento e acesso a direitos. Se destaca também a potencialidade da escuta, do acolhimento e dos grupos para o fortalecimento de vínculos no território e o papel do CRAS na articulação da rede de políticas públicas. Fica indicado, ainda, a presença mais ativa no território e o controle social como caminhos a serem fortalecidos e a necessidade de se questionar a persistência de certas práticas de tutela e controle na relação estabelecida pela política com os usuários atendidos.
Social assistance was affirmed, in Brazil’s Federal constitution in 1988, as a social right and constituted as a national policy in 2004, through SUAS creation. The realization of this constitutional right has been shaped by Brazil’s historical characteristics, though: as deep social inequality, structural racism, and welfarism culture. This paper is the result of a quality research, more specifically, intervention research, that aimed to understand how the social assistance policies have reverberated into female CRAS’s users’ lives in the city of Santos -SP. Narrative interviews have been done with 5 of the CRAS Nova Cintra’s female users. Analyses were done based on 4 categories, taken from these narratives: 1. Territory; 2. Women; 3. Race; 4. Relationship with SUAS. The results point to Bolsa Família Program and Cadastro Único as gateways to recognizing and accessing rights. It also highlights the potentiality of listening, reception and grouping to bond strengthening at the territory and to also strengthen the CRAS role at the public politics joint. It indicates, as well, the more active presence at the territory and social control as a pathway to be strengthened and the need to question the persistence of guardianship practices and control in the relationship with SUAS users.
Social assistance was affirmed, in Brazil’s Federal constitution in 1988, as a social right and constituted as a national policy in 2004, through SUAS creation. The realization of this constitutional right has been shaped by Brazil’s historical characteristics, though: as deep social inequality, structural racism, and welfarism culture. This paper is the result of a quality research, more specifically, intervention research, that aimed to understand how the social assistance policies have reverberated into female CRAS’s users’ lives in the city of Santos -SP. Narrative interviews have been done with 5 of the CRAS Nova Cintra’s female users. Analyses were done based on 4 categories, taken from these narratives: 1. Territory; 2. Women; 3. Race; 4. Relationship with SUAS. The results point to Bolsa Família Program and Cadastro Único as gateways to recognizing and accessing rights. It also highlights the potentiality of listening, reception and grouping to bond strengthening at the territory and to also strengthen the CRAS role at the public politics joint. It indicates, as well, the more active presence at the territory and social control as a pathway to be strengthened and the need to question the persistence of guardianship practices and control in the relationship with SUAS users.