"Ideologia de gênero" e a inter-relação entre os discursos político e pedagógico em uma formação discursiva conservadora
Data
2022-05-13
Autores
Silva, Bruno Caetano Felipe da 
Orientadores
Kogawa, João Marcos Mateus
Tipo
Dissertação de mestrado
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Resumo
A presente dissertação dedica-se à análise dos efeitos de sentido do uso do sintagma
nominal “ideologia de gênero” nos pronunciamentos de dois parlamentares, deputado federal
Pastor Marco Feliciano e deputado federal Luiz Fernando, então filiados ao Partido Social
Cristão (PSC) e Partido Progressista (PP), respectivamente. Os pronunciamentos ocorreram no
dia 8 de abril de 2014, durante reunião da comissão especial destinada a proferir o segundo
Plano Nacional de Educação (PNE). “Ideologia de gênero” foi repetidamente utilizado por
parlamentares, que se denominam conservadores, para se referirem à inserção de assuntos
relacionados ao sexo e gênero em determinadas disciplinas no contexto escolar. A fim de
produzir as análises que apresentamos neste trabalho, utilizamo-nos do mecanismo de
paráfrases como metodologia já aceita no campo da Análise de Discurso Francesa. Observamos,
também, a necessidade de desenvolver um método próprio para armazenar as sequências
discursivas pertinentes à nossa questão de análise, produzindo o que denominamos de “quadros
de deslinearização de enunciados”. Tal ferramenta se mostrou útil na organização do corpus de
análise, que, por sua vez, foi produzido segundo as formas definidas por Courtine (2009).
Recuperamos, como “domínio de memória” (COURTINE, 2009) da educação sexual brasileira,
a obra Didática da Educação Sexual, de Raul de Polillo. Esse livro, em três volumes e datado
da década de 1970, descreve práticas e comportamentos para se manter “harmonia entre homem
e mulher” (POLILLO, [197-], p. 88). Depreendemos, como resultado desta pesquisa, que
“ideologia de gênero” foi utilizado para descrever apenas orientações sexuais e identidades de
gênero que divergem dos sentidos que se inscrevem em uma formação discursiva conservadora
(FDCons.) (KOGAWA; TEIXEIRA, 2020). Entendemos formação discursiva como “aquilo que,
numa formação ideológica dada, isto é, a partir de uma posição dada numa conjuntura dada,
determinada pelo estado da luta de classes, determina o que pode e deve ser dito” (PÊCHEUX,
[1975] 2014, p. 147) e, ao mesmo tempo, aquilo que dá as evidências do que “cada um sabe” e
simultaneamente “o que cada um pode ver” (COURTINE, 2009, p. 74). Tais sentidos sobre o
sexo se inscrevem na FDCons. na correlação do discurso político e pedagógico com os saberes
da biologia e são atravessados pelo discurso religioso cristão.
This dissertation aims to analyze the sense effects of the usage of the noun phrases “gender ideology” in the statements of two Brazilian parliamentarians, deputy Pastor Marco Feliciano and deputy Luiz Fernando, at that time affiliated to Partido Social Cristão (PSC) and Partido Progressista (PP), respectively. “Gender ideology” was repeatedly used by parliamentarians, whose called themselves conservatives, to talk about the insertion of subjects related to sex and gender in some disciplines in the educational system. In order to produce the analysis that it is presented in this work, we used paraphrases as a methodology as a mechanism commonly used on the French Discourse Analysis. We notice, as well, the need of developing our own method to store the relevant discursive sequences to our analysis issue. As a result, we got what we call “delinearization of statements chart”. Such tool has shown itself useful in the organization of the analysis corpus; in its turn, the corpus has been produced according to the shapes defined by Courtine (2009). We had recovered as “memory domain” (COURTINE, 2009) of the Brazilian sex education the book Didática da Educação Sexual, by Raul de Polillo. This book, in three volumes and from 1970 decade, describes practices and behaviors to keep the “harmony between man and women” (POLILLO, [197-], p. 88). As a result of this research, we may state that “gender ideology” was used to describe only those sex orientations and genders identities that diverge of the senses that can be on inscribed conservative discourse formation (DFCons.) (KOGAWA; TEIXEIRA, 2020). In our understanding, discourse formations are “something that, in a certain ideology formation, that is, through an certain position in certain condition, given by the state of the class struggles, gives what can and has to be sad” (PÊCHEUX, [1975] 2014, p.147) and, at the same time, it is what makes clear what “each one knows” and simultaneously “what each one can see” (COURTINE, 2009, p. 74). Such sense about sex can be inscribed in a FDCons. in the correlation of the political and pedagogical discourse with the knowledge of biology and it is cris-crossed with the Christian discourse.
This dissertation aims to analyze the sense effects of the usage of the noun phrases “gender ideology” in the statements of two Brazilian parliamentarians, deputy Pastor Marco Feliciano and deputy Luiz Fernando, at that time affiliated to Partido Social Cristão (PSC) and Partido Progressista (PP), respectively. “Gender ideology” was repeatedly used by parliamentarians, whose called themselves conservatives, to talk about the insertion of subjects related to sex and gender in some disciplines in the educational system. In order to produce the analysis that it is presented in this work, we used paraphrases as a methodology as a mechanism commonly used on the French Discourse Analysis. We notice, as well, the need of developing our own method to store the relevant discursive sequences to our analysis issue. As a result, we got what we call “delinearization of statements chart”. Such tool has shown itself useful in the organization of the analysis corpus; in its turn, the corpus has been produced according to the shapes defined by Courtine (2009). We had recovered as “memory domain” (COURTINE, 2009) of the Brazilian sex education the book Didática da Educação Sexual, by Raul de Polillo. This book, in three volumes and from 1970 decade, describes practices and behaviors to keep the “harmony between man and women” (POLILLO, [197-], p. 88). As a result of this research, we may state that “gender ideology” was used to describe only those sex orientations and genders identities that diverge of the senses that can be on inscribed conservative discourse formation (DFCons.) (KOGAWA; TEIXEIRA, 2020). In our understanding, discourse formations are “something that, in a certain ideology formation, that is, through an certain position in certain condition, given by the state of the class struggles, gives what can and has to be sad” (PÊCHEUX, [1975] 2014, p.147) and, at the same time, it is what makes clear what “each one knows” and simultaneously “what each one can see” (COURTINE, 2009, p. 74). Such sense about sex can be inscribed in a FDCons. in the correlation of the political and pedagogical discourse with the knowledge of biology and it is cris-crossed with the Christian discourse.