Referenciação e Argumentação: uma análise dos esquetes do Porta dos Fundos sobre o racismo
Data
2020-12-14
Tipo
Dissertação de mestrado
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Resumo
Esta pesquisa se insere em uma perspectiva que entende a argumentação como constitutiva de
todos os dizeres. Quanto aos objetivos, este trabalho busca investigar o modo como a
referenciação contribui para construir a dimensão argumentativa em esquetes do Porta dos
Fundos que tratam do racismo com relação aos negros. Em específico, identificar a forma com
que se dá a constituição e transformação de referentes no esquete humorístico, e analisar como
esses processos contribuem para a dimensão argumentativa. Partindo desses objetivos, duas
questões norteiam este trabalho: 1. Como ocorre a referenciação no gênero esquete do Porta
dos Fundos? 2. Como os processos referenciais evidenciam a argumentação em torno do
racismo em esquetes do Porta dos Fundos? Para fazê-lo, foi composto o corpus com os seis
vídeos do Porta dos Fundos publicados em seu canal do YouTube entre 2012 e o primeiro
semestre de 2020 que têm como tema principal o racismo. O trabalho abarca três conceitos
teóricos fundamentais: I – a referenciação, concebida como um processo de construção e
reconstrução de referentes (objetos de discurso) que se dá na interação entre sujeitos
socioculturais e historicamente constituídos, conforme Mondada e Dubois (2003); II – a
argumentação, entendida como constitutiva dos dizeres, afinal, mesmo quando não há a
intenção deliberada de influenciar o outro, o discurso apresenta determinado modo de ver o
mundo, que tem o texto como sua materialidade, segundo Amossy (2018) e Cavalcante (2019);
III – o esquete, gênero construído por imagem em movimento, que satiriza comportamentos e
costumes, comumente fazendo críticas sociais, conforme apontam Travaglia (2017) e
Carmelino (2018). Os resultados indicam que (1) aspectos da referenciação, como as anáforas
e as (re)categorizações, ajudam a construir determinados pontos de vista. (2) Os referentes são
textualizados pelas linguagens verbal e imagética, de modo que aspectos multimodais são
imprescindíveis para a construção de sentido e da dimensão argumentativa em esquetes. (3)
Processos referenciais como os examinados nos esquetes do Porta dos Fundos que tratam do
racismo contra os negros são importantes sinalizadores na construção de denúncias contra
comportamentos naturalizados socialmente.
This research is part os a perspective that undertands argumentation as constitutive of all texts. As for the objective, this work seeks to investigate how referencing contributes to constructo the argumentative dimension in sketchs by Porta dos Fundos dealing with the racismo controversy. In particular, identify the way in which the constitution and transformation of referents in the humorous sketch, analyze how these processes contribute to the argumentative dimension. Based on these objectives, two questions guide this work: 1. How the referencing occur in the genre sketch by Porta dos Fundos? 2. How the reference processes evidence the argument around the racismo controversy in sketchs by Porta dos Fundos? To do so, the corpus was composed with the six vídeos by Porta dos Fundos published on its YouTube channel between 2012 and the half of 2020 who have racismo as their main theme. The work has three fundamental theoretical concepts: I – referencing, conceived as a process of construction and reconstruction of referents (objects of discourse), that takes place in the interaction between sociocultural and historically constituted subjects, according to Mondada and Dubois (2003); II – argumentation, understood as constitutive of texts, becouse, even when there is no deliberate intention to influence the other, the discourse presents a certain way of seeing the whorld, which has the text as its matetiality, according to Amossy (2018) and Cavalcante (2019); III – Sketch, humorous genre, constructed by moving image, that satitizes behaviors and customs, commonly making social criticismo, according to Travaglia (2017) and Carmelino (2018). The results indicate that (1) aspects of reference, such as anaphores and (re)categorizations, help build certain points of view. (2) The referents are textualized by verbal and imagery lanuages, so that, multimodal aspects are essential for constructing meaning and the argumentative dimension in sketchs. (3) Reference processes such as those examined in sketchs dealing with racismo are importante signs in the construction of denunciations against socially naturalized behaviors.
This research is part os a perspective that undertands argumentation as constitutive of all texts. As for the objective, this work seeks to investigate how referencing contributes to constructo the argumentative dimension in sketchs by Porta dos Fundos dealing with the racismo controversy. In particular, identify the way in which the constitution and transformation of referents in the humorous sketch, analyze how these processes contribute to the argumentative dimension. Based on these objectives, two questions guide this work: 1. How the referencing occur in the genre sketch by Porta dos Fundos? 2. How the reference processes evidence the argument around the racismo controversy in sketchs by Porta dos Fundos? To do so, the corpus was composed with the six vídeos by Porta dos Fundos published on its YouTube channel between 2012 and the half of 2020 who have racismo as their main theme. The work has three fundamental theoretical concepts: I – referencing, conceived as a process of construction and reconstruction of referents (objects of discourse), that takes place in the interaction between sociocultural and historically constituted subjects, according to Mondada and Dubois (2003); II – argumentation, understood as constitutive of texts, becouse, even when there is no deliberate intention to influence the other, the discourse presents a certain way of seeing the whorld, which has the text as its matetiality, according to Amossy (2018) and Cavalcante (2019); III – Sketch, humorous genre, constructed by moving image, that satitizes behaviors and customs, commonly making social criticismo, according to Travaglia (2017) and Carmelino (2018). The results indicate that (1) aspects of reference, such as anaphores and (re)categorizations, help build certain points of view. (2) The referents are textualized by verbal and imagery lanuages, so that, multimodal aspects are essential for constructing meaning and the argumentative dimension in sketchs. (3) Reference processes such as those examined in sketchs dealing with racismo are importante signs in the construction of denunciations against socially naturalized behaviors.