Navegando por Palavras-chave "Surveys And Questionnaires"
Agora exibindo 1 - 5 de 5
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
- ItemSomente MetadadadosAvaliação da influência da ansiedade e depressão no diagnóstico objetivo da doença do refluxo gastro esofágico(Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2019-09-26) Laurino Neto, Rafael Melillo [UNIFESP]; Fernandes, Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Background: Symptoms only may be unreliable to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with minor psychiatric disorders (MPD). This study aims to evaluate the influence of MPD in the diagnosis of GERD. Methods: We prospectively studied 245 patients with suspected GERD. All patients underwent pH monitoring and MPD evaluation based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: Patients were classified as GERD + (n=136, 55% of the total, mean age 46 years, 47% females) or GERD – (n=109, 45% of the total, mean age 43 years, 60% females). The mean HADS score for GERD + and GERD – for anxiety was 8 and for depression was 5 and 6, respectively, showing no difference between groups. DeMeester score did not correlate with total HADS score or depression domain but there was a negative correlation between DeMeester score and anxiety level in the analysis of all patients. We also observed a positive correlation between DeMeester score and HADS depression when we separately analyzed women and patients with extra esophageal symptoms. A significant threshold accuracy value for HADS to diagnose GERD was not found on ROC curve analysis. Conclusion: MPD do not correlate with GERD diagnosis, but only with GERD severity.
- ItemSomente MetadadadosAvaliação Dos Sintomas Depressivos De Pacientes Com Rinossinusite Crônica E Sua Correlação Com Questionário Snot-22(Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2018-11-29) Cavalhieri, Laise Teixeira [UNIFESP]; Kosugi, Eduardo Macoto [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Introduction: Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Crs) Is Defined As An Inflammation Of The Nose And Paranasal Sinuses Persisting For More Than 12 Weeks With Symptoms Significantly Negative In The Patient's Quality Of Life (Qol). Specific Questionnaires Are Used To Assess The Qol In Crs And In Brazil, The Most Used Is Snot-22. Depressive Disorders Are Highly Prevalent And In Order To Grade Their Symptoms And Diagnose Depression, International Questionnaires Have Been Created, Such As The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D). Objectives: To Evaluate Prevalence Of Depression In Patients With Crs Using An Objective Scale (Ham-17), Compare The Severity Of Crs In Patients With And Without Depression, Through The Snot-22 And Ham-17 And Correlate Snot-22 And Ham-17 Scores In Patients With Crs And Its Subgroups. Method: A Cross-Sectional Study Was Conducted Where The Snot-22 And Ham-17 Were Applied To 76 Patients With Crs. Data Were Analyzed Through The Anova And Pearson Correlation Test To Estimate The Ratio Of Depressive S
- ItemSomente MetadadadosConstrução e validação de um questionário de qualidade de vida da mulher no período menstrual(Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2021) Moraes, Patricia Albuquerque [UNIFESP]; Barbieri, Marcia [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São PauloIntroduction Menstrual symptoms may impact significantly on women lives. It has been noticed a growing number of women interested in widening the time between periods or even in terminating them, claiming this change would enhance their life quality. Objectives: To develop an instrument to assess women life quality during their menstrual period, to assess psychometric properties and to gain knowledge that affect women life quality during such time. Method: Methodological research which, after literature review and carrying out of a focal group, guided the development of an instrument draft. Content validation occurred through a judges committee. After pre-test phase, a data gathering was initiated with 469 women who filled up a questionnaire on site, at the clinic of family planning from Federal University of São Paulo, from November 2019 to March 2020 or virtually, due to COVID-19 pandemics, through Google Forms platform. Results were made public on social media from June to July 2020. To assess the plausibility of this model to the data, confirmatory fator analysis was used. In addition, exploratory fator analysis was carried out in order to assess the dimensionality suggested by the data using the method of main componentes and orthogonal rotation Varimax. Internal consistency was analyzed through Cronbach's alpha coefficient. On convergent validation, correlations among scores from women life quality questionnaire on menstrual time-window and WHOQOL-Bref dominions were analyzed through Spearman correlation. Averages among life quality on menstrual time-window were compared through Friedman non-parametric test. Results: Participating women average age in this study was 31 years old. Most was single (53,9%), having graduated from high school but not from college (42,2%), health professionals (30,3%) and students (22,2%). Confirmatory factorial analysis did not display a good fit against the original structure. An exploratory factorial analysis was conducted and, after excluding 23 items, the result was 14 factors that explained 69.6% of total data variance. Correlations between instrument scores and WHOQOL-Bref were positive and significant (<0.001). Cronbach alpha was shown adequate for 11 facets with values varying from 0.71 to 0.89. For the instrument total, it was excellent, with an alpha value of 0.91. Final version of this questionnaire was built from 42 items distributed in 11 facets which express women life quality in menstrual time-window. Concentration was the most affected life quality dimension with a 25.4 score, followed by body image and sexual activity. Conclusion: The woman’s quality of life questionnaire in the menstrual period show psychometric properties that translate themselves into a validated instrument which is both reliable and consistent. It collaborates toward the assistance of women health as an important tool.
- ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)Desenvolvimento, validação e aplicação de questionário para mapeamento de cirurgiões plásticos em procedimentos minimamente invasivos(Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2020-11-27) Worthington, Audrey Katherine [UNIFESP]; Haddad, Alessandra [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São PauloIntroduction: The number of Minimally Invasive Procedures (MIPs) performed by plastic surgeons has been increasing in recent years. Data regarding each technique, which has been carried out by specialists in this area are scarce, creating difficulties related to teaching, research, training and commercial partnerships strategies. Objective: To develop, validate and aplicate a questionnaire for mapping plastic surgeons that have been performing MIP, in order to be used for collecting data on the procedures that are the most commonly performed . Method: A questionnaire was prepared using the Design Thinking method, validated using the Delphi method, consisting of the evaluation of eight experts in the field and members of the Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery (BSPS) and applicated. The questionnaire was sent by email and by digital media from September 2019 to February 2020. Results: A total of 1451 questionnaires were answered by members of the SBCP. The questionnaire was validated with Content Validity Index (CVI), considering a CVI equal to 1, obtained in the second round. The MIPs were performed by 88.7% of the participating members, 56.8% have been working for at least six years in the area, and 40% reported to have learned about MIP in workshops or private courses. The majority of surgeons performs botulinum toxin procedure (92.3%) and fillers (83.6%) and 41.7% of them use some technologies, such as radiofrequency (50.2%) and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser (43.6%) that are the most frequent. Conclusion: A questionnaire regarding MIPs was designed, validated and aplicated to map the performance of plastic surgeons in this area, and the data showed the need to improve education and training in Cosmiatry.
- ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)Elaboração e avaliação da confiabilidade de uma escala de avaliação de usabilidade de tecnologia assistiva de comunicação aumentativa(Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2020-01-30) Ferreira, Leticia Simoes [UNIFESP]; Oliveira, Acary Souza Bulle [UNIFESP]; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3911841387107665; Santos, Vagner Rogério dos [UNIFESP]; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0921491281575273; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2565080159851100; Universidade Federal de São PauloObjective: Measure the reliability of a usability assessment tool for assistive augmentative communication technologies. Methods: Twenty-four participants were selected, 12 patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis for the Disease Group and 12 without disease and without limitation in the upper limbs for the Control Group. Participants underwent a usability test with an intelligent multifunction keyboard where they had to receive, install, program and perform a task assigned with the technology. In the end, the Augmentative Communication Assistive Technology Usability Assessment Scale was applied to participants where they based their responses on technology experience. The scale consists of general domains and one specific domain for augmentative communication technology. Each domain has items with scores ranging from 0 to 3 of the Likert type, where 0 represents negativity and / or absence of something and 3 positivity and / or presence of something. Data obtained by the scale were tabulated and analyzed using the SPSS version 24 software to calculate reliability according to Cronbach's alpha. Results: The constructed scale presented an acceptable general reliability of α 0.514 and α 0.657 for the specific domain. The technology was evaluated equally as “regular” by both groups, with no statistically significant difference between the mean scale scores between them, with p of 0.94. Conclusions: The developed scale proved to be a reliable instrument, easy to be applied, and with good interpretation by the user, whether he or she has a limiting disease or not. It serves as an important tool both for the end user of the technology, which can identify whether it has good usability, as well as for the company that makes it, avoiding unnecessary expenses and promoting good acceptance by the customer and buyers of the technology, and also for the user. professional who will be able to select the best assistive technology for his patient, avoiding abandonment and dissatisfaction with bad usability technologies.