Construção e validação de um cenário de simulação clínica para a avaliação e tratamento de lesão por pressão
Data
2022
Autores
Joaquim, Guilherme Henrique Mariano 
Orientadores
Domingues, Tânia Arena Moreira
Tipo
Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Resumo
Objetivo: Desenvolver e analisar as evidências de validade de conteúdo de um cenário simulado para a avaliação e tratamento de Lesão por Pressão. Método: Para a construção do cenário foram utilizadas as etapas propostas pelas diretrizes da The International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning e da Best Evidence Medical Education, já a para a validação do cenário, foram selecionados 11 especialistas através de critérios propostos por Fehring que, posteriormente, validaram cada cena do cenário. Eles atribuíram pontos de 1 a 4, de acordo com a escala de Likert. Essa pontuação foi utilizada para fazer o Índice de Concordância, que deveria ter no mínimo resultado de 0,8. Resultado: Foi construído o cenário que teve todos os itens propostos validados, atingindo um ICV mínimo de 0,8. Conclusão: O cenário tem potencial para ser usado por educadores e profissionais da área da saúde, bem como circular no meio científico, porém se faz necessários outros estudos que avaliem seu efeito no processo de ensino-aprendizagem.
Objective: To develop and analyze evidence of content validity of a simulated scenario for the assessment and treatment of PUs. Method: To build the scenario, the steps proposed by The International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning and Best Evidence Medical Education guidelines were used, while to validate the scenario, 11 experts were selected through criteria proposed by Fehring, who subsequently validated each scene of the scenario. They assigned points from 1 to 4 according to a Likert scale. This score was used to calculate the Agreement Index, which should have a minimum score of 0.8. Result: The scenario that had all the proposed items validated was built, reaching a minimum ICV of 0.8. Conclusion: The scenario has the potential to be used by educators and health professionals, as well as to circulate in the scientific community, but further studies are needed to evaluate its effect on the teaching-learning process.
Objective: To develop and analyze evidence of content validity of a simulated scenario for the assessment and treatment of PUs. Method: To build the scenario, the steps proposed by The International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning and Best Evidence Medical Education guidelines were used, while to validate the scenario, 11 experts were selected through criteria proposed by Fehring, who subsequently validated each scene of the scenario. They assigned points from 1 to 4 according to a Likert scale. This score was used to calculate the Agreement Index, which should have a minimum score of 0.8. Result: The scenario that had all the proposed items validated was built, reaching a minimum ICV of 0.8. Conclusion: The scenario has the potential to be used by educators and health professionals, as well as to circulate in the scientific community, but further studies are needed to evaluate its effect on the teaching-learning process.