• RI - Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Sobre
    • RI Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
  • English 
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)
  • EPM - Artigos
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)
  • EPM - Artigos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?

Thumbnail
View/Open
WOS000411259400007.pdf (157.9Kb)
Date
2017
Author
Borges, Edson, Jr.
de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP]
Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini
Setti, Amanda Souza
Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa
Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr.
Type
Artigo
ISSN
1517-5693
Is part of
Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida
DOI
10.5935/1518-0557.20170040
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Objective: To discuss the requirement from the National Health Surveillance Agency(ANVISA), for assisted reproduction treatment patients to undergo laboratory tests for ZIKV detection, and if the public health authorities and government leaders' recommendations to women simply avoid pregnancy is prudent. Methods: This study was performed in a universityaffiliated in vitro fertilization center in Brazil. We present a critical discussion on the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV infection and the prevalence of other harmful pathogens to vulnerable pregnant women and infants. We assessed, 954 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles(ICSI), between April and November of 2016, concerning the results of ZIKV test, according to different regions in Brazil. Results: Patients undergoing ICSI cycles were split into groups, according to their region of origin: 28(3.0%) were from the North, 27(2.8%) were from the Northeast, 40(4.2%) were from the Midwest, 830(87.2%) were from the Southeast, and 29(3.0%) were from the South. Concerning the diagnosis, 112 samples had a positive or inconclusive result for ZIKV, by chromatography immunoassay. These samples were re-analyzed by ELISA and no result was positive. All positive results were from the Southeast region and none from the Northeast or Midwest regions, which are considered endemic regions. Conclusion: ZIKV test before the onset of assisted reproduction treatments does not rule out the risk of the infection during pregnancy. In addition, although ZIKV infection risk is extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens.
Citation
Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 21, n. 3, p. 208-211, 2017.
Keywords
Zika virus
pregnancy
miscarriage
microcephaly
birth defects
URI
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514
Collections
  • EPM - Artigos [17701]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
Theme by 
Atmire NV