Navegando por Palavras-chave "Research intervention"

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Somente Metadadados
    Apoio à atenção básica de saúde: percurso da pesquisa-intervenção
    (Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2014-07-11) Brandalise, Carmem Lucia [UNIFESP]; Mendes, Rosilda [UNIFESP]; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3746693286898810; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1977459287536762; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
    This study analyzes the work of the Multidisciplinary Team in the Health and Care Section of Community, Department of Primary Care in the Municipality of Santos which is composed of several professional areas and divided up in a way that meets the four health districts of the municipality, organized to follow all Primary Care services. The methodology used was the research intervention, assuming the construction of spaces for collective questioning in a dialectical movement of action-reflection-action. The data were produced by six problem workshops arranged by themes chosen collectively by the subjects involved in the study: "support matrix"; "work process in health"; "care"; and "interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary." For the record, in addition to recording, it was used the methodology of the scribe, which consists of a free record of the progress of the meeting by one of the workshop participants. The ordering of data included the transcription of tapes and reading the records of the scribes and field diaries. The ordination and classification of data allowed to grasp the relevant issues settling four analytical categories: "The practice of teamwork"; "The practice of care: tensions between what you want and what you do"; "The ways of organizing work to transform the management of care"; and 'Research intervention: capability to invent and reinvent ". The study suggests the need to establish systematic spaces for discussion of the work process with primary care amount of units of responsibility of each SEATESC professional, as well as their monitoring schedules of the teams in the Primary Care services, to strengthen interdisciplinary work and the organization based on the real need of the local teams; and the SEATESC need of utilization of the potentiality of the intervention research method due to the possibility of experimentation, which allows to make room for collective reflections, to find alternative co-management and co-responsibility of care. Finally, the study found that subjects envision possibilities for the development of a supportive practice having reference from their own experience in SEATESC, so that productive assemblages are operated in a way that bring innovations to the practice of care professionals in order to qualify the care with the monitoring in network; the need to review the.