Navegando por Palavras-chave "Journal Impact Factor"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Somente Metadadados
    Avaliação Das Revistas De Enfermagem: Estado Da Arte E Desafios Atuais E Futuros
    (Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2017-12-20) Avena, Magdalena Jose [UNIFESP]; Barbosa, Dulce Aparecida [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
    The communication of the scientific research results in the nursing area is obtained by means of the publication in articles of periodicals for validation and certification. Scientific journals are assessed by bibliometric indicators that can influence the evaluation of researchers. Indexing and permanence of journals in the SciELO database depends on criteria and requirements that aim to increase the internationalization and the visibility of journals in the international scientific community. Objective: To evaluate the quantitative-qualitative performance of national journals compared to international ones with similar scope. Method: Nursing journals published in Brazil, with a broad spectrum feature within Nursing science and indexed at the SciELO base were selected and classified in Qualis A1, A2 and B1. International nursing journals selected were those with a broad spectrum and similar to the national ones, and with a Web of Science impact factor between 1.0 and 1.8. The data were collected in the different index bases and in the Journals public pages and were uploaded and tabulated by Excel® program. Results: The analysis of the bibliometric indicators showed that in the WoS the difference of the mean of JCR was 0.819 higher when comparing national and international periodicals; in the Scopus the SJR was 0.281 higher and in the CiteScore 0.77. The H index in the WoS base the difference between the means was 16.85 higher in the international journals, in the Scopus 25.58 higher and in the Google scholar the difference of the mean was 4.0 higher for the national journals. The qualitative aspects evaluated showed similarity in several aspects: all of them provide open access and electronic format, present clarity in the instructions to the authors sector and the majority, in both groups, inform anti-plagiarism actions. All national journals are published in at least two languages and only one international publication in two. Four national journals adopt continuous flow as only one international state that. The h index of the editors in chief is also balanced with a mean of h=10 for nationals and h=14 for international journals. Five national and five international journals use "How to cite" in articles and all of that has a tool for reference export. In terms of marketing and advertising, the difference is greater. The international journals are more present in the social media having several promotion resources. Among the citations received by national journals, 88% are articles in Portuguese, 10% in Spanish and 2% in English. Conclusion: The criteria for excellence imposed for journals internationalization did not bring the expected growth in the bibliometric indicators or citations in international articles of national journals of the nursing area. National journals have some challenges to face, to increase the number of articles that cite their articles attracting Spanish-speaking researchers; developing marketing and advertising mechanisms attracting attentions of authors and readers.
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Acesso aberto (Open Access)
    Indicadores bibliométricos das Revistas de Enfermagem sob a ótica das bases indexadoras
    (Univ Sao Paolo, 2017) Avena, Magdalena Jose [UNIFESP]; Barbosa, Dulce Aparecida [UNIFESP]
    Objective: To analyze the bibliometric indicators of the national and international journals in the area of nursing from the perspective of index databases. Method: A historical cohort referring to the period of 2014 to 2016. National nursing journals indexed in the SciELO database and classified in the Qualis as A1, A2 and B1, and international nursing journals with impact factor above 1.0 and below 1.8, indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus Bases, were selected. Nursing specialty periodicals were excluded. The bibliometric indicators were collected from the index databases and imported into Ms Excel for analysis and data tabulation. Results: The bibliometric indicators of the different index databases are divergent and cannot be compared. Lower title coverage and shorter calculation periods amplify the distortions between the indicators of national and international journals. Conclusion: The internationalization criteria imposed on national journals do not contribute to obtaining or increasing the impact factor. A broader coverage of indexed titles and a longer calculation period for citations represent a significant difference in results. The h-index and CiteScore appear to be better impact indicators for national nursing research.