Navegando por Palavras-chave "Desire"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
- ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)Lil Nas X Libertou Montero: Camp e Performatividade de gênero como alternativas em uma matriz opressora(Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 2023-01-20) Holzapfel, Victória [UNIFESP]; Jorge, Marina Soler [UNIFESP]; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5763073820553220; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0262SSS85638S651This article aims to understand the mechanisms that elaborate the visual of the music video MONTERO (Call Me By Your Name) by Lil Nas X and how the aesthetic representation of this clip can contribute to change the way a dissident body is placed and seen socially. Starting from the observation of how the heteronormative matrix, which constructs the notion of binary gender, presented by Judith Butler and the Catholic epistemology, commented by Henderson-Merrygold, categorize the dissident body. Then analyze how these concepts are represented and tensioned within MONTERO's narrative in contrast to the camp aesthetic, theorized by Susan Sontag, the notions of artistic performativity and gender, to create new mechanisms of identity development and desire.
- ItemAcesso aberto (Open Access)Para uma cartografia da servidão inconsciente em o Anti-Édipo de Deleuze e Guattari(Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 2019-10-25) Queiroz, Lourenco Da Silva [UNIFESP]; Fornazari, Sandro Kobol [UNIFESP]; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)May 68 profoundly marked the political context that mobilized the creation of AntiOedipus. More than a historical event in which determinism and causality can be detected, Deleuze and Guattari claim that May 68 belongs to the order of a pure happening [événement]. First of all, it is a political happening that opens a new field of possible, new life possibilities that imply, in turn, an affective mutation, a new perspective on the intolerables of social life. However, given the aspects that took over the post-68 political events, the authors' diagnosis was assertive: the possible field was continually closed not only by reactionary and fascist forces, but also by socalled left-wing organizations. The revolutionary desire of the masses was also betrayed and repressed by the organizations and the men who supposedly represented them. But why did the masses let themselves be repressed and deceived? Why were they against their own interests and aborted a revolution that seemed imminent? In this perspective, Anti-Oedipus has as its starting point and guiding thread the question raised by Spinoza: why are men led to fight for their servitude as if it were for their freedom? This research seeks to map the lines that make up the problem of voluntary servitude, from its formulation by La Boétie in the sixteenth century, going through Spinoza and Reich to the heart of Anti-Oedipus, in which the problem arises in terms of unconscious servitude. In this attempt, we pursue to research how Deleuze and Guattari lie beyond the Freudian Marxism in order to create a new conception of unconscious desire, which implies a redefinition of materialism from the desiring production category. This initial prospection allows us to show how the authors construct a perspective on unconscious servitude, based on a critique of the political-libidinal economy of social formations. Inseparable criticism of a symptomatology of the affinity coefficients between the desiring and social regimes of one and the same production. The branch of this conceptual circuit emphasizes the role of primary repression and the setting up of social repressionpsychic repression system as fundamental operators for the problematization of servitude in Anti-Oedipus. Finally, we try to outline some elements of the ethicalpolitical dimension inherent in the schizoanalytic critical program, with regard to combating unconscious servitude.