Benefits of Manometer in Non-Invasive Ventilatory Support

Página do item simplificado
dc.citation.issue6
dc.citation.volume32
dc.contributor.authorLacerda, Rodrigo Silva
dc.contributor.authorAnastacio de Lima, Fernando Cesar
dc.contributor.authorBastos, Leonardo Pereira
dc.contributor.authorVinco, Anderson Fardin
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo Schneider, Felipe Britto
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Yves Luduvico
dc.contributor.authorCosta Fernandes, Heitor Gomes
dc.contributor.authorRamos Bacalhau, Joao Marcus
dc.contributor.authorSimonelli Bermudes, Igor Matheus
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Claudinei Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Luiza Paterlini
dc.contributor.authorPezato, Rogerio [UNIFESP]
dc.coverageNew York
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-01T13:21:09Z
dc.date.available2020-09-01T13:21:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Effective ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality rates in cardiac arrest. Hyperventilation during CPR reduces the efficiency of compressions and coronary perfusion. Problem: How could ventilation in CPR be optimized? The objective of this study was to evaluate non-invasive ventilator support using different devices. Methods: The study compares the regularity and intensity of non-invasive ventilation during simulated, conventional CPR and ventilatory support using three distinct ventilation devices: a standard manual resuscitator, with and without airway pressure manometer, and an automatic transport ventilator. Student's t-test was used to evaluate statistical differences between groups. P values < .05 were regarded as significant. Results: Peak inspiratory pressure during ventilatory support and CPR was significantly increased in the group with manual resuscitator without manometer when compared with the manual resuscitator with manometer support (MS) group or automatic ventilator (AV) group. Conclusion: The study recommends for ventilatory support the use of a manual resuscitator equipped with MS or AVs, due to the risk of reduction in coronary perfusion pressure and iatrogenic thoracic injury during hyperventilation found using manual resuscitator without manometer.en
dc.description.affiliationEscola Super Bombeiros Policia Mil Estado Sao Pau, Dept Emergency Med Serv Fire Acad, Franco Da Rocha, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationInovelab, Lab Engn, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, ENT Res Lab, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, ENT Res Lab, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.format.extent615-620
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X17006719
dc.identifier.citationPrehospital And Disaster Medicine. New York, v. 32, n. 6, p. 615-620, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1049023X17006719
dc.identifier.issn1049-023X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58100
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000417138200006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCambridge Univ Press
dc.relation.ispartofPrehospital And Disaster Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectairwayen
dc.subjectcardiac arresten
dc.subjectventilatory supporten
dc.titleBenefits of Manometer in Non-Invasive Ventilatory Supporten
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Arquivos
Coleções
EPM - Artigos