Hormonal, metabolic and perceptual responses to different resistance training systems

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorCharro, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorAoki, Marcelo Saldanha
dc.contributor.authorCoutts, A. J.
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Ronaldo de Carvalho [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorBacurau, Reury Frank Pereira
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Sao Caetano do Sul
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Technol Sydney
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-18T10:46:15Z
dc.date.available2018-06-18T10:46:15Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-01
dc.description.abstractAim. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of different resistance training systems (Multiple-set [MS] and Pyramid [P]) on hormonal, metabolic and perceptual markers of internal load.Methods. Ten healthy men performed two resistance training sessions (MS and P) which consisted of three exercises (bench press, peck deck and decline bench press) with the same total volume of load lifted. The training sessions were performed 14 days apart and allocated in a counter-balanced order. Hormonal (plasma insulin, growth hormone [GH], testosterone and cortisol) and metabolic (blood glucose and lactate) responses were assessed before and after each exercise bout. Session rating of perceived exertion (session RPE) was taken 30-min following each bout.Results. No difference was observed for session-RPE between P and MS bouts (P>0.05). Plasma GH, cortisol and lactate increased significantly after exercise both bouts (P<0.01), but there were no significant changes between MS and P (P>0.05).Conclusion. It is concluded that the acute bout of resistance exercise following MS and P systems provide similar training strain when the total volume of load lifted is matched.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Sch Arts Sci & Humanities, BR-1000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Caetano do Sul, Dept Phys Educ, Sao Caetano do Sul, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Technol Sydney, Sch Leisure Tourism & Sport, Lindfield, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Biophys, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Biophys, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Health
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Sao Caetano do Sul (USCS, SP, Brazil)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIDFAPESP: 06/54683-8
dc.format.extent229-234
dc.identifierhttps://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/sports-med-physical-fitness/article.php?cod=R40Y2010N02A0229
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Sports Medicine And Physical Fitness. Turin: Edizioni Minerva Medica, v. 50, n. 2, p. 229-234, 2010.
dc.identifier.issn0022-4707
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/44696
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000283518900017
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEdizioni Minerva Medica
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Sports Medicine And Physical Fitness
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectResistance trainingen
dc.subjectWorkloaden
dc.subjectHormonesen
dc.titleHormonal, metabolic and perceptual responses to different resistance training systemsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Arquivos
Coleções
EPM - Artigos