Effects of the stimulus phase on the air-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential in healthy subjects

dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume128
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, Fernanda Emanuelle Almeida Castro [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorSahdo, Alinne Martiniano [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorGiuliano, Lydia Maria Pereira [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Denise Spinola [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Nadia Iandoli de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorManzano, Gilberto Mastrocola [UNIFESP]
dc.coverageClare
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-31T12:46:51Z
dc.date.available2020-07-31T12:46:51Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: The study aimed to examine the effect of the stimulus phase of air-conducted sound on ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs). Methods: oVEMPs were recorded after air-conducted sounds (500 Hz, 4 ms duration), presented with initial condensation (positive), rarefaction (negative), and alternant polarities from 12 healthy subjects. Results: Most responses showed a bifid n10 peak separated by similar to 1.9 ms. The most prominent sub-peak after condensation was shorter than the most prominent sub-peak after rarefactionen
dc.description.abstracthowever, the first sub-peak was shorter after the rarefaction stimuli. When a third sub-peak appeared, it occurred before the most prominent sub-peak after condensation and after the most prominent sub-peak after rarefaction. The latency difference between this third sub-peak and the closest sub-peak was shorter than the difference among the others sub-peaks, in both casesen
dc.description.abstractthe oVEMPs after alternating stimuli was an amalgam of the responses to the different stimuli. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the negative to positive change of the stimulus was the main event responsible for the stimulation, and that when a third sub-peak appeared it was related to the initiation or the end of the stimulus. Significance: These findings suggested that the oVEMP response, obtained by air conducted sound, was secondary to stimulation of the same type of afferent vestibular unit, independent of the stimulus polarity. (C) 2016 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.affiliationFed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Neurol & Neurosurg Dept, Clin Neurophysiol Sect, Rua Botucatu 704, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespClinical Neurophysiology Sector, Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Botucatu n. 704, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.format.extent262-269
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.001
dc.identifier.citationClinical Neurophysiology. Clare, v. 128, n. 1, p. 262-269, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.001
dc.identifier.issn1388-2457
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/56412
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000396377300033
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Neurophysiology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectoVEMPen
dc.subjectAir conducted sounden
dc.subjectCondensationen
dc.subjectRarefactionen
dc.subjectLatenciesen
dc.subjectVestibular stimulationen
dc.titleEffects of the stimulus phase on the air-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential in healthy subjectsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Arquivos
Coleções