Análise comparativa de laudos de ressonância magnética em texto versus audiovisual em afecções musculoesqueléticas
Carregando...
Data
2023-09-14
Autores
Muniz Neto, Francisco Júlio [UNIFESP]
Orientadores
Szarf, Gilberto [UNIFESP]
Tipo
Tese de doutorado
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Resumo
Os estudos de radiologia são inerentemente visuais e os relatórios destes estudos geralmente são construídos como documentos no formato de texto. Os relatórios audiovisuais ainda não foram extensivamente investigados, assim como sua comparação com o relatório em texto. Neste estudo transversal, comparamos qualitativa e quantitativamente relatórios audiovisuais versus relatórios em texto em afecções musculoesqueléticas. Para isso, 40 ortopedistas receberam relatórios sobre 10 casos diferentes de pacientes com patologias musculoesqueléticas, que foram estudados por ressonância magnética. Vinte ortopedistas receberam primeiro os relatórios audiovisuais e tiveram total acesso às imagens, em seguida responderam um questionário. Em seguida receberam o relatório no formato de texto, preenchendo um segundo questionário. Os outros vinte ortopedistas receberam primeiro o relatório em formato de texto e tiveram acesso total às imagens, preenchendo em seguida o primeiro questionário. Depois receberam os relatórios audiovisuais e responderam o segundo questionário. Das respostas obtidas dos 40 ortopedistas, 92% preferiram receber os relatórios audiovisuais em relação ao relatório em texto. Não houve mudança na confiança dos ortopedistas em relação aos achados descritos no grupo que recebeu, inicialmente, os relatórios audiovisuais. Por outro lado, houve um aumento da confiança em alguns dos casos em que foi apresentado inicialmente o relatório de texto e depois os relatórios audiovisuais. O formato de relatório audiovisual oferece a oportunidade para o radiologista descrever e apontar achados de imagem relevantes e foi o método preferido pelos médicos solicitantes.
Radiology studies are inherently visual and reports are often constructed as a text document. Audiovisual reports have not been extensively investigated, as well as their comparison with text reports. We qualitatively and quantitatively compared audiovisual versus text reports on musculoskeletal pathologies using a cross-sectional study in which 40 orthopedic surgeons received reports on 10 different cases with musculoskeletal pathologies that were studied by magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty orthopedic surgeons first received the audiovisual reports, had full access to the images and then answered a first questionnaire. They then received the text report and completed a second questionnaire. The other twenty orthopedic surgeons first received the text report and had full access to the images. They completed the first questionnaire and then received the audiovisual reports, then answered the second questionnaire. Among the responses obtained from the 40 orthopedic surgeons, 92% would prefer to receive the audiovisual reports over the text report. The group that initially received the audiovisual reports demonstrated no change in confidence; on the other hand, there was an increase in confidence for some of the cases in which the text report was shown initially and then the audiovisual reports. The audiovisual report format offers the opportunity for the radiologist to describe and point out relevant imaging findings, and was the preferred method by the referring physicians.
Radiology studies are inherently visual and reports are often constructed as a text document. Audiovisual reports have not been extensively investigated, as well as their comparison with text reports. We qualitatively and quantitatively compared audiovisual versus text reports on musculoskeletal pathologies using a cross-sectional study in which 40 orthopedic surgeons received reports on 10 different cases with musculoskeletal pathologies that were studied by magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty orthopedic surgeons first received the audiovisual reports, had full access to the images and then answered a first questionnaire. They then received the text report and completed a second questionnaire. The other twenty orthopedic surgeons first received the text report and had full access to the images. They completed the first questionnaire and then received the audiovisual reports, then answered the second questionnaire. Among the responses obtained from the 40 orthopedic surgeons, 92% would prefer to receive the audiovisual reports over the text report. The group that initially received the audiovisual reports demonstrated no change in confidence; on the other hand, there was an increase in confidence for some of the cases in which the text report was shown initially and then the audiovisual reports. The audiovisual report format offers the opportunity for the radiologist to describe and point out relevant imaging findings, and was the preferred method by the referring physicians.
Descrição
Citação
MUNIZ NETO, Francisco Júlio. Análise comparativa de laudos de ressonância magnética em texto versus audiovisual em afecções musculoesqueléticas. 2023. 60 f. Tese (Doutorado em Radiologia Clínica) - Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). São Paulo, 2023.