Effect of conventional physical therapy and Pilates in functionality, respiratory muscle strength and ability to exercise in hospitalized chronic renal patients: a randomized controlled trial

Página do item simplificado
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.volume31
dc.contributor.authorSarmento, Lais A.
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Juliana S. S. T.
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Ana P. P.
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Cristina M. N.
dc.contributor.authorChiavegato, Luciana D. [UNIFESP]
dc.coverageLondon
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T14:02:27Z
dc.date.available2020-07-17T14:02:27Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the effect of conventional physical therapy and Pilates on function, restoration, and exercise ability in hospitalized chronic renal patients. Methods: A total of 56 inpatients were randomized into two groups: Conventional physical therapy and Pilates. The primary outcomes were functionality (Barthel Index), respiratory muscle strength (manovacuometry), and ability to exercise (step test) evaluated in the following periods: preintervention, after the 5th session, and after the 10th session or at discharge. Threemonths after randomization, the Barthel Index was applied over the phone. At the end of the 10 sessions or at discharge, the length of hospital stay was calculated and the level of satisfaction with physical therapy care was assessed (MedRisk). Linear mixed models were used for the primary outcomes and the Student's t-test was used for length of stay and satisfaction. Results: There was no significant between-group difference in functionality (MD -1.3en
dc.description.abstract95% CI -2.8 to 5.4), inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength (MD -1.3en
dc.description.abstract95% CI -7.3 to 4.5/MD -4.5en
dc.description.abstract95% CI -0.7 to 9.7, respectively), performance in the step test (MD -3.3en
dc.description.abstract95% CI -6.2 to 12.8), patient satisfaction with physical therapy care (MD -2.0en
dc.description.abstract95% CI -5.1 to 9.1), and length of stay (MD 4.5en
dc.description.abstract95% CI -15.9 to 6.8). Conclusion: Both interventions, conventional physical therapy and Pilates, showed improvements and there is no difference between them. Therefore both can be used in chronic renal patients.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Cidade Sao Paulo, Masters Program Phys Therapy, Rua Cesario Galeno 475, BR-03071000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Cidade Sao Paulo, Doctoral Program Phys Therapy, Rua Cesario Galeno 475, BR-03071000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Pulmonol Div, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Pulmonol Div, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.format.extent508-520
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215516648752
dc.identifier.citationClinical Rehabilitation. London, v. 31, n. 4, p. 508-520, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269215516648752
dc.identifier.issn0269-2155
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54815
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000400092500009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Rehabilitation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectExercise therapyen
dc.subjectPilatesen
dc.subjecthospitalizationen
dc.subjectchronic kidney diseaseen
dc.titleEffect of conventional physical therapy and Pilates in functionality, respiratory muscle strength and ability to exercise in hospitalized chronic renal patients: a randomized controlled trialen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Arquivos
Coleções
EPM - Artigos