Effects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory study

Página do item simplificado
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume13
dc.contributor.authorVolpe, Márcia Souza [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorNaves, Juliane Moreira
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Gabriel G.
dc.contributor.authorRuas, Gualberto
dc.contributor.authorTucci, Mauro Roberto
dc.coverageSan Francisco
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-08T13:09:41Z
dc.date.available2020-07-08T13:09:41Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Manual hyperinflation (MH), a maneuver applied in mechanically ventilated patients to facilitate secretion removal, has large variation in its performance. Effectiveness of MH is usually evaluated by its capacity to generate an expiratory flow bias. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of MH-and its resulting flow bias D applied according to clinical practice versus according to expert recommendation on mucus movement in a lung model simulating a mechanically ventilated patient. Methods Twelve physiotherapists were asked to apply MH, using a self-inflating manual resuscitator, to a test lung as if to remove secretions under two conditions: according to their usual clinical practice (pre-instruction phase) and after verbal instruction to perform MH according to expert recommendation was given (post-instruction phase). Mucus simulant movement was measured with a photodensitometric technique. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF), peak inspiratory pressure (P-IP), inspiratory time (T-INSP), tidal volume (V-T) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured continuously. Results It was found that MH performed post-instruction delivered a smaller VT (643.1 +/- 57.8 ml) at a lower P-IP (15.0 +/- 1.5 cmH(2)O), lower PIF (38.0 +/- 9.6 L/min), longer T-INSP (1.84 +/- 0.54 s) and lower PEF (65.4 +/- 6.7L/min) compared to MH pre-instruction. In the pre-instruction phase, MH resulted in a mean PIF/PEF ratio of 1.73 +/- 0.38 and mean PEF-PIF difference of -54.6 +/- 28.3 L/min, both out of the range for secretion removal. In the post-instruction phase both indexes were in the adequate range. Consequently, the mucus simulant was moved outward when MH was applied according to expert recommendation and towards the test lung when it was applied according to clinical practice. Conclusions Performance of MH during clinical practice with PIF higher than PEF was ineffective to clear secretion in a lung model simulating a mechanically ventilated patient. In order to remove secretion, MH should result in an adequate expiratory flow bias.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Human Movement Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Triangulo Mineiro, Dept Appl Physiotherapy, Uberaba, MG, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Lab Med Res 09, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Human Movement Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.format.extent-
dc.identifierhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191787
dc.identifier.citationPlos One. San Francisco, v. 13, n. 2, p. -, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0191787
dc.identifier.fileWOS000424814300011.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54131
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000424814300011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library Science
dc.relation.ispartofPlos One
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleEffects of manual hyperinflation, clinical practice versus expert recommendation, on displacement of mucus simulant: A laboratory studyen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000424814300011.pdf
Tamanho:
2.38 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Baixar
Coleções
ISS - Artigos