Comparative Effects of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound and Low-Level Laser Therapy on Injured Skeletal Muscle

dc.contributor.authorRenno, Ana Claudia Muniz [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorToma, Renata Luri [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorFeitosa, Suellen Maurin [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Kelly Rossetti [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorBossini, Paulo Sergio [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Poliani de [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorParizotto, Nivaldo Antonio [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Daniel Araki [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:06:00Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:06:00Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: the main purpose of this study was to compare the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (US) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on injured skeletal muscle after cryolesion by means of histopathological analysis and immunohistochemistry for cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2). Background and Methods: Thirty-five male Wistar rats were randomly distributed into four groups: intact control group with uninjured and untreated animals; injured control group with muscle injury and no treatment; LLLT-treated group with muscle injury treated with 830-nm laser; and US-treated group with muscle injury treated with US. Treatments started 24 h postsurgery and were performed during six sessions. Results: LLLT-treated animals presented minor degenerative changes of muscle tissue. Exposure to US reduced tissue injuries induced by cryolesion, but less effectively than LLLT. A large number of COX-2 positive cells were found in untreated injured rats, whereas COX-2 immunoexpression was lower in both LLLT-and US-treated groups. Conclusion: This study revealed that both LLLT and US therapies have positive effects on muscle metabolism after an injury in rats, but LLLT seems to produce a better response.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, UNIFESP, Dept Biosci, Santos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, UNIFESP, Dept Physiotherapy, Santos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, UNIFESP, Dept Biosci, Santos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, UNIFESP, Dept Physiotherapy, Santos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.format.extent5-10
dc.identifierhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2715
dc.identifier.citationPhotomedicine and Laser Surgery. New Rochelle: Mary Ann Liebert Inc, v. 29, n. 1, p. 5-10, 2011.
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pho.2009.2715
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33313
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000286052000003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Inc
dc.relation.ispartofPhotomedicine and Laser Surgery
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.titleComparative Effects of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound and Low-Level Laser Therapy on Injured Skeletal Muscleen
dc.typeArtigo
Arquivos
Coleções