Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorFeldner, Paulo Cezar [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Rodrigo Aquino [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorCipolotti, Luiz Antonio [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorDelroy, Carlos Antonio [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerreira Sartori, Marair Gracio [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorBatista Castello Girao, Manoel Joao [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:05:24Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:05:24Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-01
dc.description.abstractThis study seeks to compare the small intestine submucosa (SIS) graft with traditional colporrhaphy (TC) for surgical treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse.Subjects were randomly assigned to SIS (n = 29) or to TC (n = 27) preoperatively and outcomes analyzed at 12 months postoperatively. the primary outcome was the absence of POP-Q stage a parts per thousand yenaEuro parts per thousand II prolapse, and secondary outcome was improvement in quality of life. Data were compared with independent samples or paired Student's t test.SIS group had 86.2% anatomic cure compared to 59.3% in TC (p = 0.03). SIS improved point Ba measurement significantly (-1.93 cm versus -1.37 cm, p = 0.02). Both operations significantly improved quality of life, although there were no differences between the groups. We observed a greater number of complications in the SIS group, with no infections or erosion.SIS repair improved point Ba significantly. However, there were no differences observed in quality of life between the techniques.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Sect Urogynecol & Pelv Surg, Dept Gynecol, BR-04025001 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Sect Urogynecol & Pelv Surg, Dept Gynecol, BR-04025001 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.format.extent1057-1063
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1163-8
dc.identifier.citationInternational Urogynecology Journal. London: Springer London Ltd, v. 21, n. 9, p. 1057-1063, 2010.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-010-1163-8
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/32861
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000280392200003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urogynecology Journal
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.licensehttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dc.subjectAnterior vaginal prolapseen
dc.subjectSIS graften
dc.subjectTraditional repairen
dc.titleAnterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphyen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Arquivos
Coleções
EPM - Artigos