Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorChulvi-Medrano, Iván
dc.contributor.authorRial, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorCortell-Tormo, Juan M.
dc.contributor.authorAlakhdar, Yasser
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorMasiá-Tortosa, Laura
dc.contributor.authorDorgo, Sandor
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-19T11:49:36Z
dc.date.available2019-08-19T11:49:36Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractManual resistance training (MRT) has been widely used in the field of physical therapy. It has also been used as a strength training method due to the accommodating resistance nature of this modality. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week MRT program on maximum strength and muscular endurance in comparison to conventional resistance training in recreationally trained men. Twenty healthy recreationally trained male subjects were recruited and divided into a MRT training group and a conventional training (CT) group. CT group performed bench press and lat pull-down exercises, and the MRT group performed similar movements with resistance provided by a personal trainer. Both groups completed similar training protocol and training load: 2 training sessions weekly for 3 sets of 8 repetitions at an intensity of 8 to 10 on the perceived exertion scale of 0-10. Initial maximum strength differences were not significant between the groups. Neither group showed significant changes in muscular strength or endurance. Despite the statistically non-significant pre-to post differences, a trend for improvement was observed and effect size (ES) calculations indicated greater magnitude of effects for strength and endurance changes in the MRT group in lat pulldown (g=0.84) compared to CT group. Effectiveness of MRT is similar to CT for improving muscular strength and endurance. MRT can be used as a supplemental or alternative strength training modality for recreationally trained subjects, or be considered by personal trainers especially in low equipped facility conditions.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Alicante, Dept Gen & Specif Didact, Alicante, Spain
dc.description.affiliationBenestar Wellness Ctr, Valencia, Spain
dc.description.affiliationInt Hypopress & Phys Therapy Inst, Vigo, Spain
dc.description.affiliationUniv Valencia, Dept Phys Therapy, Valencia, Spain
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed São Paulo, Dept Biosci, Santos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationPraia Grande Coll, Fac Phys Educ, Praia Grande, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Texas El Paso, Dept Kinesiol, 1851 Wiggins St, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniv Fed São Paulo, Dept Biosci, Santos, Brazil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.format.extent343-349
dc.identifierhttps://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xml
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Sports Science And Medicine. Bursa, v. 16, n. 3, p. 343-349, 2017.
dc.identifier.fileWOS000407360500006.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1303-2968
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000407360500006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJournal Sports Science & Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectStrength trainingen
dc.subjectBench pressen
dc.subjectLat pull-downen
dc.subjectMaximum strengthen
dc.titleManual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Menen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000407360500006.pdf
Tamanho:
489.85 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Baixar
Coleções
ISS - Artigos