Navegando por Palavras-chave "Publicações periódicas"

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Acesso aberto (Open Access)
    Authorship for scientific papers: the new challenges
    (Soc Brasil Cirurgia Cardiovasc, 2010-10-01) Garcia, Carla Costa; Martrucelli, Cristina Ribeiro Nabuco; Rossilho, Marilisa de Melo Freire; Denardin, Odilon Victor Porto [UNIFESP]; Univ Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP); Hosp Heliopolis
    The dissemination of the practice of collaborative authorship (coauthorship) in Brazil and in the international scientific community has been accompanied by an increasing occurrence of frauds, manipulations and other deviations in the assignment of responsibility for a scientific paper. This article discusses the criteria for authorship attribution, the reasons for the growing indices of coauthorship and the challenges to determine authorship in electronic journals. Through literature review and case study (bibliographic search in scientific database), it shows ways to avoid that misbehaviors related to the authorship attribution affect the credibility of science.
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Acesso aberto (Open Access)
    Critérios de autoria em trabalhos científicos: um assunto polêmico e delicado
    (Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, 2004-12-01) Monteiro, Rosangela; Jatene, Fabio Biscegli; Goldenberg, Saul [UNIFESP]; Población, Dinah Aguiar; Pellizzon, Rosely de Fátima [UNIFESP]; Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP); Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia Núcleo de Comunicação Científica em Cirurgia
    Aspects related to the authorship of scientific publications, inherent responsibilities, unethical practices and criteria for definition are discussed in this article. Moreover, the article presents a reflection on the role of editors of scientific journals in respect to inpproper authorship, reinforcing the importance of the issue and suggesting ethical criteria for its determination.
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Acesso aberto (Open Access)
    Revistas brasileiras publicadoras de artigos científicos em cirurgia. II - Terminologia e atribuições adotadas pelos editores. Proposta de organograma do periódico e fluxograma do artigo
    (Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, 2003-12-01) Población, Dinah Aguiar; Goldenberg, Saul [UNIFESP]; Montero, Edna Frasson de Souza [UNIFESP]; Gomes, Paulo de Oliveira [UNIFESP]; Campanatti-Ostiz, Heliane; Moreira, Márcia Bento; Santos, Aparecida Cássia dos [UNIFESP]; Pellizzon, Rosely de Fátima [UNIFESP]; Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP); NCCC
    PURPOSE: To identify the terminology adopted by the editor to assign the editorial board members and attributions related to the team components responsible for the policies, administration, and contents quality of the journal. To recommend the journal organogram and the article fluxogram. METHODS: It was analyzed more recent numbers from selected journals, available at Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information and other medical libraries from Brazil, presented at the first part of this research. In this sample, it was identified the terminology and attributions adopted by the editors from each journal to designate the responsible for the content and the style of the journal. RESULTS: The adopted terminology for the editorial board in each journal was collected showing the diversification of the terms for similar functions. It was identified 74 terms, classified in five categories, assigning activities exerted by the editorial board members, involved in the journal production and diffusion. Under the editorial perspective, printed or electronic, the categorization of the different phases of the process provided subsidies to elaborate the Organogram of the scientific periodical. The interpretation of the activities and responsibilities of each member in the organogram is described in the Profile and responsibilities of the editorial board members. To insert each member of the editorial board, according to its respective responsibility, it was possible to elaborate the Paper fluxogram. CONCLUSION: There is no uniformity to designate terms and attributions for the members of the editorial board in the studied journals. Recommendations are presented for the journal organogram and the article fluxogram.
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Acesso aberto (Open Access)
    Revistas brasileiras publicadoras de artigos científicos em cirurgia. III: análise das instruções aos autores baseada na estrutura dos requisitos de Vancouver
    (Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, 2007-12-01) Pellizzon, Rosely de Fátima [UNIFESP]; Montero, Edna Frasson de Souza [UNIFESP]; Población, Dinah Aguiar; Monteiro, Rosangela; Castro, Regina Célia Figueiredo; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP); NCCC; Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Núcleo de Comunicação Científica em Cirurgia; Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde
    PURPOSE: To analyze the instructions for authors of Brazilian scientific journals in the surgery field, in order to describe the present situation, as well to make recommendations for editors and authors. METHODS: Instruction for authors of 20 journals were analyzed and classified following Vancouver requirements. Instructions were taken from SciELO, from the journals homepage, or from the last printed issue available in BIREME s collection. Results were descriptively analyzed, considering the frequency of each variable. RESULTS: 75% of the journals recommended ICMJE Uniform Requirements, although not always the newest version was indicated; 90% of the journals mentioned ethical research principles, 80% the peer-review process and 70% the conflict of interests and the author rights transfer agreement. Foreign languages frequently accepted were English (80%) and Spanish (30%). All journals publish original papers, followed by reviews (90%), case reports (80%), letters to the editor (70%), and clinical updates or continuing education (55%). The nomenclature for the sections varied among journals. CONCLUSION: Even though publishing freedom and independence of each publisher must be respected, there are internationally accepted criteria that must be observed. The current trends, towards the prioritization of open access electronic journals, will lead to important changes in the process of publishing scientific journals.