Esthetic perception of changes in facial profile resulting from orthodontic treatment with extraction of premolars A systematic review

dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume148
dc.contributor.authorIared, Walter [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Edina Mariko Koga da [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorIared, Wagner [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorMacedo, Cristiane Rufino de [UNIFESP]
dc.coverageChicago
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-31T12:46:47Z
dc.date.available2020-07-31T12:46:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBackground. The authors conducted a systematic review to assess changes in patients' facial profiles resulting from orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of 4 premolars and to identify cephalometric parameters that can assist decision making in borderline cases. Types of Studies Reviewed. The authors conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing the 2 types of treatment (with and without premolar extraction) in terms of the changes in facial profile. The authors conducted an electronic search of the databases the Cochrane Library, PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, and Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature. Results. The authors identified 1 clinical trial with 26 participants and 5 observational cohort studies, collectively involving 362 participants. The authors assessed cephalometric parameters and esthetic outcomes. Four studies used linear regression analysis to investigate esthetic interaction between treatment strategy and initial lower lip protrusion. The 4 studies determined that if the initial lip protrusion was beyond a determined point, esthetic preferences favored extraction, and if the initial lip protrusion was not to that point, esthetic preferences favored conservative treatment. Conclusions and Practical Implications. The results of the authors' systematic review found no significant differences between the groups in terms of the esthetic outcomes. The cephalometric parameter of initial lip protrusion can help with decision making in borderline cases.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Emergency Med & Evidence Based Med, Sch Med, Rua Borges Lagoa,564 Cj 63, BR-04038000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Evidence Based Med, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Borges Lagoa, 564 Cj. 63, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, CEP 04038-000, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespDepartment of Evidence-Based Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.format.extent9-16
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2016.09.004
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of The American Dental Association. Chicago, v. 148, n. 1, p. 9-16, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.adaj.2016.09.004
dc.identifier.issn0002-8177
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/56358
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000397188500013
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmer Dental Assoc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of The American Dental Association
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen
dc.subjectmalocclusionen
dc.subjecttooth extractionen
dc.subjectestheticsen
dc.subjectcephalometryen
dc.subjectevidence-based dentistryen
dc.titleEsthetic perception of changes in facial profile resulting from orthodontic treatment with extraction of premolars A systematic reviewen
dc.typeArtigo
Arquivos
Coleções