Evidence-Based Medicine in Plastic Surgery Are We There Yet?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Leal, Daniel G.
dc.contributor.author Rodrigues, Maria Amelia [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Tedesco, Ana Carolina B. [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Nahas, Fabio Xerfan [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Ferreira, Lydia Masako [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Roxo, Ana C. W.
dc.contributor.author de Castro, Claudio Cardoso
dc.contributor.author Aboudib, Jose Horacio
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T18:52:13Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T18:52:13Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001179
dc.identifier.citation Annals Of Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, v. 80, n. 1, p. 71-75, 2018.
dc.identifier.issn 0148-7043
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53955
dc.description.abstract Background: The practice of evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery is no longer a trend but a reality, with a growing number of studies published in recent years using evidence-based medicine as an assessment tool. Objective: The aim of this study was to verify whether the number of citations to articles with a high level of evidence is greater than articles with low level of evidence. Methods: A search was conducted in the 4 main international journals of plastic surgery. All original articles published in 2011 were analyzed, selected, and classified based on the study design. The articles were then divided into 2 groups: group 1, high level of evidence en
dc.description.abstract and group 2, low level of evidence. Next, Scopus was searched for the number of citations of each article in the 2 subsequent years. The proportion of the number of citations received by articles in groups 1 and 2 was statistically compared. Results: The articles with the highest level of evidence were the most cited among original articles, with 48.6% of them being cited more than 10 times over 2 years, whereas only 18.4% of articles in group 2 were cited with the same frequency. The mean number of citations was 12.6 citations per article in group 1 and 6.56 citations in group 2, with a significant difference between groups (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The articles with a higher level of evidence are, on average, cited more often than those with low levels of evidence in the leading journals of plastic surgery. en
dc.format.extent 71-75
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartof Annals Of Plastic Surgery
dc.rights Acesso restrito
dc.subject evidence-based medicine en
dc.subject citations en
dc.subject impact factor en
dc.title Evidence-Based Medicine in Plastic Surgery Are We There Yet? en
dc.type Artigo
dc.description.affiliation Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Div Plast Surg, Blvd 28 Setembro,77 Vila Isabel, BR-20551030 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
dc.description.affiliation Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Div Plast Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifesp Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Div Plast Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001179
dc.description.source Web of Science
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000418719900018
dc.coverage Philadelphia
dc.citation.volume 80
dc.citation.issue 1



File

File Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

Statistics

My Account