Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSegovia, Julio M. G.
dc.contributor.authorDel-Claro, Kleber
dc.contributor.authorWillemart, Rodrigo Hirata [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:39:52Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:39:52Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003252
dc.identifier.citationBehaviour. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, v. 152, n. 6, p. 757-773, 2015.
dc.identifier.issn0005-7959
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38615
dc.description.abstractThe threat sensitive hypothesis predicts that animals modulate the defensive behaviour with the level of threat. Therefore, responses to predator cues may differ from responses to the actual predator in close range. Also, in high threat situations, prey would be expected to use their most dangerous defences. the recluse spider Loxosceles gaucho (Araneae, Sicariidae) is known to prey upon well defended harvestmen such as the laniatorid Mischonyx cuspidatus (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae), which has been reported to use tanathosis, chemical defences, pinching with sharp apophyses on legs, chelicerae and pedipalps. Because of harvestmen's dependence on chemical stimuli, we tested if M. cuspidatus would change its locomotory behaviour in the presence of chemicals of the recluse spider (low threat situation: spider vs blank vs chemical control; one at a time). Subsequently, we tested harvestmen behaviour in the presence of the spider in close range, a high-threat situation. Finally, we looked at the survival rate of spiders after being pierced by sharp apophyses that M. cuspidatus have on legs IV. the harvestmen only showed defensive behaviours in the high threat situation. Surprisingly, their mostly known defensive behaviours (chemical defence, tanathosis, pinching with chelicerae and pedipalps) were not seen even in the high threat situation. This is the first evidence that these behaviours are not used against a natural predator that has an almost 80% predation success when attacking harvestmen. Pinching with the sharp legs IV apophyses may perforate but do not kill the spiders. We highlight the importance of the traditional descriptive approach with natural predators to understand the specificities of defensive behaviours against different types of predator.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.format.extent757-773
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBrill Academic Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofBehaviour
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.subjectArachnidaen
dc.subjectLaniatoresen
dc.subjectdefensive behaviouren
dc.subjectdeimaticen
dc.subjectchemoreceptionen
dc.titleDefences of a Neotropical harvestman against different levels of threat by the recluse spideren
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionInst Biol
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.description.affiliationInst Biol, BR-38400902 Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Escola Artes Ciencias & Humanidades, Lab Ecol Sensorial & Comportamento Artropodes, BR-03828000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Inst Biociencias, Programa Pos Grad Zool, BR-03828000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Programa Pos Grad Ecol & Evolucao, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Programa Pos Grad Ecol & Evolucao, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/1568539X-00003252
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000353392900003


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record