Optimal Management of Gastric Cancer Results From an International RAND/UCLA Expert Panel

Date
2014-01-01Author
Coburn, Natalie
Seevaratnam, Rajini
Paszat, Lawrence
Helyer, Lucy
Law, Calvin
Swallow, Carol
Cardosa, Roberta
Mahar, Alyson
Lourenço, Laércio Gomes [UNIFESP]
Dixon, Matthew
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios
Chau, Ian
Church, Neal
Coit, Daniel
Crane, Christopher H.
Earle, Craig
Mansfield, Paul
Marcon, Norman
Miner, Thomas
Noh, Sung Hoon
Porter, Geoff
Posner, Mitchell C.
Prachand, Vivek
Sano, Takeshi
van de Velde, Cornelis
Wong, Sandra
McLeod, Robin
Type
ArtigoISSN
0003-4932Is part of
Annals of SurgeryDOI
10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288dd2bMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective: Defining processes of care, which are appropriate and necessary for management of gastric cancer (GC), is an important step toward improving outcomes.Methods: Using a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, an international multidisciplinary expert panel created 22 statements reflecting optimal management. All statements were scored for appropriateness and necessity.Results: the following tenets were scored appropriate and necessary: (1) preoperative staging by computed tomography of abdomen/pelvis; (2) positron-emission tomographic scans not routinely indicated; (3) consideration for adjuvant therapy; (4) further clinical trials; (5) multidisciplinary decision making; (6) sufficient support at hospitals; (7) assessment of 16 or more lymph nodes (LNs); (8) in metastatic disease, surgery only for palliation of major symptoms; (9) surgeons experienced in GC management; (10) and surgeons experienced in both GC management and advanced laparoscopic surgery for laparoscopic resection. the following were scored appropriate, but of indeterminate necessity: (1) diagnostic laparoscopy before treatment; (2) a multidisciplinary approach to linitis plastica; (3) genetic assessment for diffuse GC and family history, or age less than 45 years; (4) endoscopic removal of select T1aN0 lesions; (5) D2 LN dissection in curative intent cases; (6) D1 LN dissection for early GC or patients with comorbidities; (7) frozen section analysis of margins; (8) nonemergent cases performed in a hospital with a volume of more than 15 resections per year; and (9) by a surgeon with more than 6 resection per year.Conclusions: the expert panel has created 22 statements for the perioperative management of GC patients, to provide guidance to clinicians and improve the care received by patients.
Citation
Annals of Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 259, n. 1, p. 102-108, 2014.Keywords
cancergastric
management
stomach
Sponsorship
Canadian Cancer SocietyOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Hanna Family Research Chair in Surgical Oncology
National Health Service
Collections
- EPM - Artigos [17701]