• RI - Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Sobre
    • RI Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
  • English 
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)
  • EPM - Artigos
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)
  • EPM - Artigos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Temporal resolution: assessment procedures and parameters for school-aged children

Thumbnail
View/Open
S1808-86942013000300010.pdf (271.4Kb)
Date
2013-05-01
Author
Amaral, Maria Isabel Ramos do
Faria Martins, Paula Maria
Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca [UNIFESP]
Type
Artigo
ISSN
1808-8694
Is part of
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
DOI
10.5935/1808-8694.20130057
Metadata
Show full item record
Alternative Title
Resolução temporal: procedimentos e parâmetros de avaliação em escolares
Abstract
Temporal resolution enables the identification of fine differences in speech segmental aspects. Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and Gaps-In-Noise Test (GIN) evaluate such skills, by using different acoustic parameters.Objective: To compare the performance of normal school aged children without learning disabilities and/or hearing complaints in the GIN and RGDT, and analyze potential performance differences in these two procedures.Method: Cross sectional contemporary cohort study. 28 children, aged 8-10 years were evaluated. After peripheral audiological evaluation, RGDT and GIN were performed.Results: There were no statistical differences in performance between gender and age on the RGDT and GIN tests, between the right and left ears on the GIN test, and between frequencies on the RGDT test. the mean detection threshold gap for RGDT was 9.25 +/- 3.67 ms, and for GIN was 4.32 +/- 0.61 ms (right ear) and 4.43 +/- 0.79 ms (left ear). the results of the GIN Test were statistically lower than those from the RGDT (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Both tests indicated normal temporal resolution for all 28 children. GIN test presents advantages regarding the ease of application, task variable, stimuli and presentations form. However, the RGDT has advantages concerning the time required for administration and scoring.
Citation
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. São Paulo: Assoc Brasileira Otorrinolaringologia & Cirurgia Cervicofacial, v. 79, n. 3, p. 317-324, 2013.
Keywords
auditory perception
child
hearing tests
URI
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/36260
Collections
  • EPM - Artigos [16302]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
Theme by 
Atmire NV