Cyanoacrylate Versus Laser in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Masked and Non-linferiority Clinicall Trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Flecha, Olga D.
dc.contributor.author Azevedo, Camila G. S.
dc.contributor.author Matos, Fabiana R.
dc.contributor.author Vieira-Barbosa, Natalia M.
dc.contributor.author Ramos-Jorge, Maria L.
dc.contributor.author Goncalves, Patricia F.
dc.contributor.author Koga Silva, Edina M. [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-24T14:31:23Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-24T14:31:23Z
dc.date.issued 2013-03-01
dc.identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120165
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Periodontology. Chicago: Amer Acad Periodontology, v. 84, n. 3, p. 287-294, 2013.
dc.identifier.issn 0022-3492
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/36072
dc.description.abstract Background: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a painful, exaggerated response to normal stimuli, such as cold, sweetness, and brushing. the aim of the present controlled, randomized, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of cyanoacrylate in the treatment of DH when compared to the application of low-intensity laser.Methods: the study includes 434 sensitive teeth from 62 patients. A total of 216 teeth were treated with laser and 218 with cyanoacrylate. A numeric rating scale was used to record the parameters of pain related to the stimuli at baseline and after the treatment at intervals of 24 hours and 30, 90, and 180 days.Results: Both groups had significant reductions in DH. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups <= 6 months. Intragroup analysis showed that the effect of cyanoacrylate obtained at 24 hours remained for 90 days in response to air-jet test and 30 days for cold-spray test. There was a statistically significant difference between all other intragroup comparisons at the time intervals (P<0.001).Conclusions: It was concluded that cyanoacrylate is as effective as low-intensity laser in reducing DH. in addition, it is a more accessible and low-cost procedure and can be safely used in the treatment of DH. J Periodontol 2013;84:287-294. en
dc.description.sponsorship State of Minas Gerais Foundation
dc.description.sponsorship Brazilian Federal Agency
dc.description.sponsorship Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.format.extent 287-294
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Amer Acad Periodontology
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Periodontology
dc.rights Acesso restrito
dc.subject Cyanoacrylates en
dc.subject dentin hypersensitivity en
dc.subject dentin sensitivity en
dc.subject laser therapy, low-level en
dc.subject randomized controlled trial en
dc.title Cyanoacrylate Versus Laser in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Masked and Non-linferiority Clinicall Trial en
dc.type Artigo
dc.contributor.institution Fed Univ Jequitinhonha & Mucuri Valleys
dc.contributor.institution Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.description.affiliation Fed Univ Jequitinhonha & Mucuri Valleys, Dept Dent, BR-39100000 Diamantina, MG, Brazil
dc.description.affiliation Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Med, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifesp Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Med, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifier.doi 10.1902/jop.2012.120165
dc.description.source Web of Science
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000316162700004



File

File Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

Statistics

My Account