Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSouza, E. O. de
dc.contributor.authorTricoli, V.
dc.contributor.authorPaulo, A. C.
dc.contributor.authorSilva-Batista, C.
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, R. K.
dc.contributor.authorBrum, P. C.
dc.contributor.authorBacurau, A. V. N.
dc.contributor.authorLaurentino, G.
dc.contributor.authorNeves-, M.
dc.contributor.authorAihara, A. Y. [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.authorUgrinowitsch, C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:28:06Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:28:06Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1314813
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Medicine. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag Kg, v. 33, n. 12, p. 970-974, 2012.
dc.identifier.issn0172-4622
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35580
dc.description.abstractThis study performed an exploratory analysis of the anthropometrical and morphological muscle variables related to the one-repetition maximum (1RM) performance. in addition, the capacity of these variables to predict the force production was analyzed. 50 active males were submitted to the experimental procedures: vastus lateralis muscle biopsy, quadriceps magnetic resonance imaging, body mass assessment and 1RM test in the leg-press exercise. K-means cluster analysis was performed after obtaining the body mass, sum of the left and right quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (Sigma CSA), percentage of the type II fibers and the 1RM performance. the number of clusters was defined a priori and then were labeled as high strength performance (HSP1RM) group and low strength performance (LSP1RM) group. Stepwise multiple regressions were performed by means of body mass, Sigma CSA, percentage of the type II fibers and clusters as predictors' variables and 1RM performance as response variable. the clusters mean +/- SD were: 292.8 +/- 52.1 kg, 84.7 +/- 17.9 kg, 19249.7 +/- 1645.5 mm(2) and 50.8 +/- 7.2% for the HSP1RM and 254.0 +/- 51.1 kg, 69.2 +/- 8.1 kg, 15483.1 +/- 1 104.8 mm(2) and 51.7 +/- 6.2 %, for the LSP1RM in the 1RM, body mass, Sigma CSA and muscle fiber type II percentage, respectively. the most important variable in the clusters division was the Sigma CSA. in addition, the Sigma CSA and muscle fiber type II percentage explained the variance in the 1RM performance (Adj R-2 = 0.35, p = 0.0001) for all participants and for the LSP1RM (Adj R-2 = 0.25, p = 0.002). for the HSP1RM, only the Sigma CSA was entered in the model and showed the highest capacity to explain the variance in the 1RM performance (Adj R-2 = 0.38, p = 0.01). As a conclusion, the muscle CSA was the most relevant variable to predict force production in individuals with no strength training background.en
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.format.extent970-974
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherGeorg Thieme Verlag Kg
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Sports Medicine
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.subject1RMen
dc.subjectmuscle biopsyen
dc.subjectcross-sectional areaen
dc.subjectbody massen
dc.titleMultivariate Analysis in the Maximum Strength Performanceen
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Paulista UNIP
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Nove Julho
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Dept Sport, Sch Phys Educ & Sport, BR-05508 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Paulista UNIP, Dept Phys Educ, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Nove Julho, Dept Phys Educ, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Sch Med, BR-05508 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Radiol, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifespUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Radiol, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipIDCNPq: 303162/2008-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIDCNPq: 470207/2008-6
dc.description.sponsorshipIDCNPq: 152658/2011-4
dc.description.sponsorshipIDCNPq: 304814/2010-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIDFAPESP: 2007/02738-6
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0032-1314813
dc.description.sourceWeb of Science
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000311416100005


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record