dc.contributor.author | Ekberg, Henrik | |
dc.contributor.author | Tedesco-Silva, Helio | |
dc.contributor.author | Demirbas, Alper | |
dc.contributor.author | Vitko, Stefan | |
dc.contributor.author | Nashan, Bjorn | |
dc.contributor.author | Guerkan, Alp | |
dc.contributor.author | Margreiter, Raimund | |
dc.contributor.author | Hugo, Christian | |
dc.contributor.author | Grinyo, Josep M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Frei, Ulrich | |
dc.contributor.author | Vanrenterghem, Yves | |
dc.contributor.author | Daloze, Pierre | |
dc.contributor.author | Halloran, Philip F. | |
dc.contributor.author | ELITE Symphony Study | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-24T13:49:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-24T13:49:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-12-20 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067411 | |
dc.identifier.citation | New England Journal of Medicine. Waltham: Massachusetts Medical Soc, v. 357, n. 25, p. 2562-2575, 2007. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0028-4793 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30219 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Immunosuppressive regimens with the fewest possible toxic effects are desirable for transplant recipients. This study evaluated the efficacy and relative toxic effects of four immunosuppressive regimens.Methods: We randomly assigned 1645 renal-transplant recipients to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus. the primary end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end points included acute rejection and allograft survival.Results: the mean calculated GFR was higher in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (65.4 ml per minute) than in the other three groups (range, 56.7 to 59.4 ml per minute). the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (12.3%) than in those receiving standard-dose cyclosporine (25.8%), low-dose cyclosporine (24.0%), or low-dose sirolimus (37.2%). Allograft survival differed significantly among the four groups (P=0.02) and was highest in the low-dose tacrolimus group (94.2%), followed by the low-dose cyclosporine group (93.1%), the standard-dose cyclosporine group (89.3%), and the low-dose sirolimus group (89.3%). Serious adverse events were more common in the low-dose sirolimus group than in the other groups (53.2% vs. a range of 43.4 to 44.3%), although a similar proportion of patients in each group had at least one adverse event during treatment (86.3 to 90.5%).Conclusions: A regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose tacrolimus may be advantageous for renal function, allograft survival, and acute rejection rates, as compared with regimens containing daclizumab induction plus either low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus or with standard-dose cyclosporine without induction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00231764.). | en |
dc.format.extent | 2562-2575 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Massachusetts Medical Soc | |
dc.relation.ispartof | New England Journal of Medicine | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.title | Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation | en |
dc.type | Artigo | |
dc.contributor.institution | Lund Univ | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Akdeniz Univ | |
dc.contributor.institution | Inst Klin & Expt Med | |
dc.contributor.institution | Hannover Med Sch | |
dc.contributor.institution | SB Tepecik Hosp | |
dc.contributor.institution | Univ Klin | |
dc.contributor.institution | Univ Hosp | |
dc.contributor.institution | Ciutat Univ Bellvitge | |
dc.contributor.institution | Free Univ Berlin | |
dc.contributor.institution | Katholieke Univ Leuven | |
dc.contributor.institution | CHU Montpellier | |
dc.contributor.institution | Univ Alberta | |
dc.description.affiliation | Lund Univ, Malmo, Sweden | |
dc.description.affiliation | Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil | |
dc.description.affiliation | Akdeniz Univ, Antalya, Turkey | |
dc.description.affiliation | Inst Klin & Expt Med, Prague, Czech Republic | |
dc.description.affiliation | Hannover Med Sch, D-30623 Hannover, Germany | |
dc.description.affiliation | SB Tepecik Hosp, Izmir, Turkey | |
dc.description.affiliation | Univ Klin, Innsbruck, Austria | |
dc.description.affiliation | Univ Hosp, Erlangen, Germany | |
dc.description.affiliation | Ciutat Univ Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain | |
dc.description.affiliation | Free Univ Berlin, Klinikum Rudolf Virchow, Charite, D-1000 Berlin, Germany | |
dc.description.affiliation | Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium | |
dc.description.affiliation | CHU Montpellier, Notre Dame Hosp, Montreal, PQ, Canada | |
dc.description.affiliation | Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada | |
dc.description.affiliationUnifesp | Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1056/NEJMoa067411 | |
dc.description.source | Web of Science | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000251728900007 | |