• RI - Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Sobre
    • RI Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
  • español 
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   Repositorio Institucional UNIFESP
  • UNIFESP
  • Unifesp - Em verificação
  • Em verificação - Geral
  • Ver ítem
  •   Repositorio Institucional UNIFESP
  • UNIFESP
  • Unifesp - Em verificação
  • Em verificação - Geral
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation

Thumbnail
Fecha
2007-12-20
Autor
Ekberg, Henrik
Tedesco-Silva, Helio
Demirbas, Alper
Vitko, Stefan
Nashan, Bjorn
Guerkan, Alp
Margreiter, Raimund
Hugo, Christian
Grinyo, Josep M.
Frei, Ulrich
Vanrenterghem, Yves
Daloze, Pierre
Halloran, Philip F.
ELITE Symphony Study
Tipo
Artigo
ISSN
0028-4793
Es parte de
New England Journal of Medicine
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa067411
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Resumen
Background: Immunosuppressive regimens with the fewest possible toxic effects are desirable for transplant recipients. This study evaluated the efficacy and relative toxic effects of four immunosuppressive regimens.Methods: We randomly assigned 1645 renal-transplant recipients to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus. the primary end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end points included acute rejection and allograft survival.Results: the mean calculated GFR was higher in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (65.4 ml per minute) than in the other three groups (range, 56.7 to 59.4 ml per minute). the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (12.3%) than in those receiving standard-dose cyclosporine (25.8%), low-dose cyclosporine (24.0%), or low-dose sirolimus (37.2%). Allograft survival differed significantly among the four groups (P=0.02) and was highest in the low-dose tacrolimus group (94.2%), followed by the low-dose cyclosporine group (93.1%), the standard-dose cyclosporine group (89.3%), and the low-dose sirolimus group (89.3%). Serious adverse events were more common in the low-dose sirolimus group than in the other groups (53.2% vs. a range of 43.4 to 44.3%), although a similar proportion of patients in each group had at least one adverse event during treatment (86.3 to 90.5%).Conclusions: A regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose tacrolimus may be advantageous for renal function, allograft survival, and acute rejection rates, as compared with regimens containing daclizumab induction plus either low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus or with standard-dose cyclosporine without induction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00231764.).
Cita
New England Journal of Medicine. Waltham: Massachusetts Medical Soc, v. 357, n. 25, p. 2562-2575, 2007.
URI
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30219
Colecciones
  • Em verificação - Geral [8394]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contacto
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Listar

Todo repositorioComunidades & coleccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasPor fecha de envíoEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasPor fecha de envío

Mi cuenta

Acceder

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contacto
Theme by 
Atmire NV