• RI - Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Sobre
    • RI Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
  • English 
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Paulista de Enfermagem (EPE)
  • EPE - Artigos
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Paulista de Enfermagem (EPE)
  • EPE - Artigos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Subjective assessment of backrest elevation: Magnitude of error

Thumbnail
Date
2006-11-01
Author
Peterlini, Maria Angelica S.
Rocha, Patricia K.
Kusahara, Denise M.
Pedreira, Mavilde L. G.
Type
Artigo
ISSN
0147-9563
Is part of
Heart & Lung
DOI
10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.05.003
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Backrest elevation, defined as the angle of the backrest height above the horizontal position, is a common nursing intervention that is often used by subjective visual estimation in critically ill patients.OBJECTIVES: the aim of the study was to describe the magnitude of error during the subjective assessment of backrest elevation.METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in a sample of 160 subjects: 97 registered nurses, 48 undergraduate nursing students, and 15 nursing assistants. Data were collected by recording the degrees of backrest elevation identified by the subjects through an individual random presentation of the selected study angles of 20 degrees, 30 degrees, 35 degrees, 40 degrees, and 45 degrees. A measurement instrument was developed for determination of the angles.RESULTS: of the 800 investigated angles, 14.9% were estimated accurately, 61.6% were overestimated, and 23.5% were underestimated, with, an error average of 8 degrees (+/- 13.5 degrees). It was determined that the larger the angle estimated, the greater the average error. A statically significant difference (P <= .001) was found between the actual degree of backrest elevation and the estimated backrest elevation for 20 degrees, 40 degrees, and 45 degrees with the exception of 30 degrees and 35 degrees, which had similar averages of error. Years of critical care experience did not significantly influence the magnitude of error.CONCLUSION: the results indicate that the subjective assessment of backrest angle may result in errors that may potentially compromise the patient's condition and supports the need for a more objective method for determining backrest angle.
Citation
Heart & Lung. New York: Mosby-Elsevier, v. 35, n. 6, p. 391-396, 2006.
URI
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/29232
Collections
  • EPE - Artigos [1072]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
Theme by 
Atmire NV