• RI - Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Sobre
    • RI Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
  • English 
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)
  • EPM - Artigos
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)
  • EPM - Artigos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Sulfated glycosaminoglycans of the vagina and perineal skin in pre- and postmenopausal women, according to genital prolapse stage

Thumbnail
Date
2004-08-01
Author
Bezerra, LRPS
Feldner, P. C.
Kati, L. M.
Girao, MJBC
Sartori, M. G.
Baracat, E. C.
Lima, G. R. de
Nader, H. B.
Dietrich, C. P.
Type
Artigo
ISSN
0937-3462
Is part of
International Urogynecology Journal
DOI
10.1007/s00192-004-1150-z
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the amount and types of sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the posterior vaginal wall and perineal skin in menacme and postmenopausal women, according to genital prolapse stage. Samples of vaginal tissue and perineal skin were obtained from 40 women who underwent vaginal surgery. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans were extracted by extensive tissue maxatase digestion, submitted to electrophoresis on agarose gel, and their concentrations were determined by densitometry. Dermatan sulphate (DS) was the predominant GAG, followed by chondroitin sulfate (CS) and heparan sulfate (HS). in the vagina there was a significant decrease in total GAGs, CS, DS and HS in postmenopausal women with prolapse stage 2 and 3 compared to the premenopausal group, independent of the stage. in stage 2 and 3 postmenopausal patients there was a significant decrease of DS and HS compared to the stage 1 postmenopausal group. in perineal skin there was no significant difference between total GAG amount, DS and HS. However, the amount of CS in premenopausal stage 1 patients was significantly than that in postmenopausal patients stage 1 and stages 2 and 3. in conclusions, there are quantitative and qualitative differences in GAGs of the ECM in vaginal wall and perineal skin between women in menacme and the postmenopause, according to genital prolapse stage.
Citation
International Urogynecology Journal. Godalming: Springer London Ltd, v. 15, n. 4, p. 266-271, 2004.
Keywords
extracellular matrix
genital prolapse
glycosaminoglycans
postmenopause
URI
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/27848
Collections
  • EPM - Artigos [17701]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
Theme by 
Atmire NV