• RI - Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Sobre
    • RI Unifesp
    • Documentos
    • Tutoriais
    • Perguntas frequentes
    • Atendimento
    • Equipe
  • español 
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • English
    • español
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   Repositorio Institucional UNIFESP
  • Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)
  • EPM - Artigos
  • Ver ítem
  •   Repositorio Institucional UNIFESP
  • Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)
  • EPM - Artigos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

An open-label randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of sirolimus vs. azathioprine in living related renal allograft recipients receiving cyclosporine and prednisone combination

Thumbnail
Fecha
2004-02-01
Autor
Machado, P. G.
Felipe, C. R.
Hanzawa, N. M.
Park, S. I.
Garcia, R.
Alfieri, F.
Franco, M.
Silva, H. T.
Medina-Pestana, J. O.
Tipo
Artigo
ISSN
0902-0063
Es parte de
Clinical Transplantation
DOI
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00113.x
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Resumen
Background: the ability of sirolimus (SRL), in combination with reduced exposure of cyclosporine, was investigated to prevent acute rejection and associated side effects.Methods: Between June 1999 and February 2000, 70 recipients of primary one-haplotype living-related donor renal allografts were randomized to receive SRL (2 mg/d) or azathioprine (AZA) (2 mg/kg/d) combined with cyclosporine and prednisone. the primary end-point was a composite of first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death during the first 3 months after transplantation.Results: From week 4 to month 12, SRL patients received lower cyclosporine (week 4: 364 mg/d vs. 455 mg/d, p = 0.004; month 12: 195 mg/d vs. 255 mg/d, p = 0.038) doses and showed lower cyclosporine concentrations (week 4: 247 ng/mL vs. 309 ng/mL, p = 0.04; month 12: 143 ng/mL vs. 188 ng/mL, p = 0.045). Compared with AZA, SRL patients showed reduced 3-month primary end point (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.025), and reduced incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 3 months (0% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.01) but not at 12 months (11.4% vs. 14.3%, NS). Mean creatinine at 12 months were not different (1.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6, p = 0.23). Hyperlipidemia was the only adverse event more frequent among SRL patients (49% vs. 17%, p = 0.01). There were no differences in infections and no malignancies in both groups.Conclusions: the combination of 2 mg fixed doses of SRL, reduced cyclosporine exposure and prednisone was associated with a low incidence of acute rejection and did not result in significantly impaired graft function compared with patients receiving AZA, standard doses of cyclosporine and prednisone.
Cita
Clinical Transplantation. Copenhagen: Blackwell Munksgaard, v. 18, n. 1, p. 28-38, 2004.
Palabras clave
acute rejection
clinical trial
cyclosporine
kidney transplantation
sirolimus
URI
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/27629
Colecciones
  • EPM - Artigos [17707]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contacto
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Listar

Todo repositorioComunidades & coleccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasPor fecha de envíoEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasPor fecha de envío

Mi cuenta

Acceder

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contacto
Theme by 
Atmire NV