Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Posteromedial Versus Direct Posterior Approach for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reinsertion|
|Authors:||Ambra, Luiz Felipe M. [UNIFESP]|
Franciozi, Carlos Eduardo S. [UNIFESP]
Werneck, Luiz Guilherme M. [UNIFESP]
de Queiroz, Antonio A. B. [UNIFESP]
Yamada, Ricardo K. [UNIFESP]
Granata, Geraldo Sergio M., Jr. [UNIFESP]
Debieux, Pedro [UNIFESP]
Luzo, Marcus Vinicius M. [UNIFESP]
|Citation:||Orthopedics. Thorofare, v. 39, n. 5, p. E1024-E1027, 2016.|
|Abstract:||Avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) are usually found in pediatric populations. This study investigated which of 2 approaches-posteromedial or direct posterior-enables easier PCL reinsertion. Ten fresh cadavers were studied using direct posterior (10 knees) and posteromedial (10 knees) approaches. In both, a guidewire was inserted into the tibial insertion of the PCL as perpendicular as possible to the coronal knee axis. Then, the angle between the guidewire and the horizontal plane of the table was measured. The mean angle of the guidewire was 8.6 degrees (SD=7.3 degrees) with the direct posterior approach and 36.6 degrees (SD=14.3 degrees) with the posteromedial approach (P=.005). The direct posterior approach allows a greater degree of freedom compared with the posteromedial approach to reach the PCL tibial insertion.|
|Appears in Collections:||Editorial|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.