Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Sequential randomised and double blind trial of promethazine prophylaxis against early anaphylactic reactions to antivenom for bothrops snake bites|
|Authors:||Fan, H. W.|
Marcopito, Luiz Francisco [UNIFESP]
Ferrari, R. A.
Warrell, D. A.
Hosp Vital Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
|Publisher:||British Med Journal Publ Group|
|Citation:||British Medical Journal. London: British Med Journal Publ Group, v. 318, n. 7196, p. 1451-1453, 1999.|
|Abstract:||Objective. To investigate the efficacy of the H-1 antihistamine promethazine against early anaphylactic reactions to antivenom.Design. Sequential randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.Setting Public hospital in a venom research institute, S (a) over tilde o Paulo, Brazil.Participants. 101 patients requiring antivenom treatment after being bitten by bothrops snakes.Intervention. Intramuscular injection of promethazine (25 mg for adults and 0.5/kg for children) or placebo given 15-20 min before starting intravenous infusion of antivenom.Main outcome measures. Incidence and severity of anaphylactic reactions occurring within 24 hours after antivenom.Results. Reactions occurred in 12 of 49 patients treated with promethazine (24%) and in 13 of 52 given placebo (25%); most were mild or moderate. Continuous sequential analysis indicated that the study could be interrupted at the 22nd untied pair, without preference for promethazine or placebo.Conclusion. Prophylaxis with promethazine does not prevent early reactions. Patients should be observed carefully during antivenom infusion and the subsequent few hours.|
|Appears in Collections:||Artigo|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.