Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Vitreomacular Traction Syndrome: Postoperative Functional and Anatomic Outcomes|
|Authors:||Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP]|
Rodrigues, Eduardo B. [UNIFESP]
Farah, Michael [UNIFESP]
Maia, Mauricio [UNIFESP]
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Univ Autonoma Barcelona
|Citation:||Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers & Imaging Retina. Thorofare: Slack Inc, v. 46, n. 2, p. 235-242, 2015.|
|Abstract:||BACKGROUND and OBJECTIVE: To analyze a variety of vitreomacular traction (VMT) morphologies to establish a major classification that better reflects the preoperative predictive factors of postoperative visual and anatomic outcomes.PATIENTS and METHODS: Thirty-six eyes submitted to vitrectomy surgery were categorized with a VMT pattern (V- or J-shaped) and diameter (focal < 1,500 mu m or broad > 1,500 mu m) based on optical coherence tomography.RESULTS: the researchers compared different classifications of VMT. Despite similar postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) values (P = .393), cases with focal VMT had greater visual improvement (P = .027) because the preoperative BCVA was significantly lower in the focal group (P = .007). However, the BCVA improvements did not differ between the groups regarding the classic VMT morphologic patterns (P = .235).CONCLUSION: Postoperative outcomes and macular disorders are closely related to VMT size. the adhesion diameter (focal or broad VMT) and not the classic VMT morphologic pattern (V- or J-shaped) may better predict the postoperative anatomic and functional outcomes.|
|Appears in Collections:||Em verificação - Geral|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.