Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35249
Title: A Histopathologic Review of Undiagnosed Neoplasms in 205 Evisceration Specimens
Authors: Novais, Eduardo A.
Fernandes, Bruno F.
Pacheco, Luiz F.
Di Cesare, Sebastian
Miyamoto, Cristina [UNIFESP]
Briccoli, Tiago A.
Burnier, Miguel N. [UNIFESP]
McGill Univ
Henry C Witelson Ocular Pathol Lab
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Issue Date: 1-Sep-2012
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citation: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 28, n. 5, p. 331-334, 2012.
Abstract: Purpose: Evisceration and enucleation are 2 ophthalmic surgeries used to treat blind and painful eyes. the benefits of evisceration over enucleation are many but this procedure is contraindicated in cases of a suspected intra-ocular mass. Given the lack of such studies in the literature, our aim was to review a large sample of eviscerated specimens to document the prevalence of unexpected neoplasms.Methods: During the study period (1994-2011), 13,591 human ophthalmic specimens were received at the Henry C. Witelson Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory and Registry. of those, 205 were evisceration specimens. Histopathologic reports were reviewed to retrieve relevant clinical information that included clinical diagnosis, age, gender, laterality, and final histopathologic diagnosis.Results: the total number of unexpected neoplasms was 4 (1.95%) including 2 (0.97%) malignancies: necrotic melanoma (1), ciliary body adenoma (1), iris nevus (1), and spindle cell melanoma (1). All the other remaining eyes had histopathologic findings that were consistent with the underlying diagnosis.Conclusions: With proper pre-operative evaluation, including history, ophthalmologic examination, and imaging studies, the rate of unexpected neoplasms in evisceration specimens were low. Evisceration is a simpler and cheaper procedure when compared with enucleation, and our results corroborate its safety, whenever indicated to treat blind and/or painful eyes. (Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 28: 331-334)
URI: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35249
ISSN: 0740-9303
Other Identifiers: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31825ca5d8
Appears in Collections:Em verificação - Geral

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.