Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Incentive spirometry for preventing pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass graft|
|Authors:||Freitas, Eliane R. F. S.|
Soares, Bernardo G. O. [UNIFESP]
Cardoso, Jefferson R.
Atallah, Alvaro N. [UNIFESP]
UNOPAR Ctr Cochrane Brasil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
|Keywords:||Coronary Artery Bypass [*adverse effects]|
Forced Expiratory Volume
Lung Diseases [etiology; *prevention & control]
Pneumonia [etiology; prevention & control]
Positive-Pressure Respiration [methods]
Pulmonary Atelectasis [etiology; prevention & control]
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
|Citation:||Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, n. 9, 63 p., 2012.|
|Abstract:||BackgroundIncentive spirometry (IS) is a treatment technique that uses a mechanical device to reduce pulmonary complications during postoperative care. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2007.ObjectivesUpdate the previously published systematic review to compare the effects of IS for preventing postoperative pulmonary complications in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).Search methodsWe searched CENTRAL and DARE on the Cochrane Library (Issue 2 of 4 2011), MEDLINE OVID (1948 to May 2011), EMBASE (1980 to Week 20 2011), LILACS (1982 to July 2011), the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) (1980 to July 2011), Allied & Complementary Medicine (AMED) (1985 to May 2011), CINAHL (1982 to May 2011).Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials comparing IS with any type of prophylactic physiotherapy for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in adults undergoing CABG.Data collection and analysisTwo reviewers independently evaluated trial quality using the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and extracted data from included trials. for continuous outcomes, we used the generic inverse variance method for meta-analysis and for dichotomous data we used the Peto Odds Ratio.Main resultsThis update included 592 participants from seven studies (two new and one that had been excluded in the previous review in 2007. There was no evidence of a difference between groups in the incidence of any pulmonary complications and functional capacity between treatment with IS and treatment with physical therapy, positive pressure breathing techniques (including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB), active cycle of breathing techniques (ACBT) or preoperative patient education. Patients treated with IS had worse pulmonary function and arterial oxygenation compared with positive pressure breathing. Based on these studies there was no improvement in the muscle strength between groups who received IS demonstrated by maximal inspiratory pressure and maximal expiratory pressure.Authors' conclusionsOur update review suggests there is no evidence of benefit from IS in reducing pulmonary complications and in decreasing the negative effects on pulmonary function in patients undergoing CABG. in view of the modest number of patients studied, methodological shortcomings and poor reporting of the included trials, these results should still be interpreted cautiously. An appropriately powered trial of high methodological rigour is needed to determine if there are patients who may derive benefit from IS following CABG.|
|Appears in Collections:||Em verificação - Geral|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.