Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Belatacept-Based Regimens Versus a Cyclosporine A-Based Regimen in Kidney Transplant Recipients: 2-Year Results From the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT Studies
Authors: Larsen, Christian P.
Grinyo, Josep
Medina-Pestana, Jose [UNIFESP]
Vanrenterghem, Yves
Vincenti, Flavio
Breshahan, Barbara
Campistol, Josep M.
Florman, Sander
del Carmen Rial, Maria
Kamar, Nassim
Block, Alan
Di Russo, Gregory
Lin, Chen-Sheng
Garg, Pushkal
Charpentier, Bernard
Emory Univ
Univ Hosp Bellvitge
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Univ Hosp Leuven
Univ Calif San Francisco
Med Coll Wisconsin
Univ Barcelona
Mt Sinai Med Ctr
Inst Nefrol
CHU Rangueil
Bristol Myers Squibb Co
Univ Paris S 11
Keywords: Belatacept
Cyclosporine A
Kidney transplant
Issue Date: 27-Dec-2010
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citation: Transplantation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 90, n. 12, p. 1528-1535, 2010.
Abstract: Background. At 1 year, belatacept was associated with similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, and an improved cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine A (CsA) in the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as Firstline Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT) and Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as Firstline Immunosuppression Trial-EXTended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT) studies. Acute rejection was more frequent with belatacept in BENEFIT. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD)-specifically central nervous system PTLD-was observed more frequently in belatacept-treated patients. This analysis assesses outcomes from BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT after 2 years of treatment.Methods. Patients received a more intensive (MI) or a less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept or a CsA-based regimen.Results. Four hundred ninety-three of 666 patients(74%) in BENEFIT and 347 of 543(64%) in BENEFIT-EXT completed 2 years of treatment. the proportion of patients who survived with a functioning graft was similar across groups (BENEFIT: 94% MI, 95% LI, and 91% CsA; BENEFIT-EXT: 83% MI, 84% LI, and 83% CsA). Belatacept's renal benefits were sustained, as evidenced by a 16 to 17 mL/min (BENEFIT) and an 8 to 10 mL/min (BENEFIT-EXT) higher calculated glomerular filtration rate in the belatacept groups versus CsA. There were few new acute rejection episodes in either study between years 1 and 2. Because PTLD risk was highest in Epstein-Barr virus(EBV)(-) patients, an efficacy analysis of EBV(+) patients was performed and was consistent with the overall population results. There were two previously reported cases of PTLD in each study between years 1 and 2 in the belatacept groups. the overall balance of safety and efficacy favored the LI over the MI regimen.Conclusions. At 2 years, belatacept-based regimens sustained better renal function, similar patient/graft survival, and an improved cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus CsA; outcomes that were maintained in EBV (+) patients. No new safety signals emerged.
ISSN: 0041-1337
Other Identifiers:
Appears in Collections:Artigo

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.