Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Multicenter evaluation of mycobacteria identification by PCR restriction enzyme analysis in laboratories from Latin America and the Caribbean
Authors: Leao, S. C.
Bernardelli, A.
Cataldi, A.
Zumarraga, M.
Robledo, J.
Realpe, T.
Mejia, G. I.
Telles, MAD
Chimara, E.
Velazco, M.
Fernandez, J.
Rodrigues, P. A.
Guerrero, M. I.
Leon, C. I.
Porras, T. B.
Rastogi, N.
Goh, K. S.
Suffys, P.
Rocha, A. D.
Netto, D. D.
Ritacco, V
Lopez, B.
Barrera, L.
Palomino, J. C.
Martin, A.
Portaels, F.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Corp Invest Biol
Univ Pontificia Bolivariana
Inst Adolfo Lutz Registro
Inst Salud Publ Chile
Inst Nacl Salud
Inst Pasteur Guadeloupe
Fdn Oswaldo Cruz
Inst Nacl Enfermedades Infecciosas Carlos Malbran
Inst Trop Med
Keywords: Mycobacterium
species identification
Issue Date: 1-May-2005
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Citation: Journal of Microbiological Methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., v. 61, n. 2, p. 193-199, 2005.
Abstract: The identification of mycobacterial species in clinical isolates is essential for making patient care decisions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction enzyme analysis (PRA) is a simple and rapid identification method, based on amplification of 441 bp of the hsp65 gene and restriction with BstEII and HaeIII. As a contribution to the validation of PRA, a multicenter study was performed in eight laboratories located in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, and Guadeloupe. Each laboratory received 18 coded isolates from the collection of the Institute of Tropical Medicine (Antwerp, Belgium), representing duplicates of nine laboratory strains: Mycobacterium terrae CIPT 140320001, Mycobacterium scrofulaceum CIPT 140220031, Mycobacterium flavescens ATCC 14474, Mycobacterium triviale ATCC 23292, Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum ATCC 19530, Mycobacterium chitae ATCC 19627, Mycobacterium abscessus ATCC 19977, Mycobacterium kansasii ATCC 12478, and Mycobacterium peregrinum ATCC 14467. A detailed protocol including amplification, enzymatic digestion, and gel preparation was provided to each laboratory. Two laboratories identified correctly all 18 (100%) isolates, one identified correctly 17 (94.5%), two identified 14 (77.7%), one identified 11 (61%), and two identified 8 (44.4%) isolates. Errors detected in laboratories with more than 77% accuracy were associated with electrophoresis running conditions and an unspecific amplicon produced by a single strain. Lower accuracy was mainly related to inappropriate use of DNA markers and insufficient training in interpretation of patterns. in conclusion, the PRA method was readily implemented in some Latin American and Caribbean laboratories of mycobacteria, but improvements in critical points, as gel running conditions and training in interpretation of patterns, are needed in order to improve accuracy. in others, improvement in critical points is still necessary. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ISSN: 0167-7012
Other Identifiers:
Appears in Collections:Em verificação - Geral

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.