Image analysis software versus direct anthropometry for breast measurements

Image analysis software versus direct anthropometry for breast measurements

Author Espírito Santo, Paulo Rogério Quieregatto do Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Hochman, Bernardo Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Furtado, Fabianne Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Machado, Aline Fernanda Perez Google Scholar
Sabino Neto, Miguel Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Ferreira, Lydia Masako Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Institution Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Abstract PURPOSE:To compare breast measurements performed using the software packages ImageTool(r), AutoCAD(r) and Adobe Photoshop(r) with direct anthropometric measurements.METHODS:Points were marked on the breasts and arms of 40 volunteer women aged between 18 and 60 years. When connecting the points, seven linear segments and one angular measurement on each half of the body, and one medial segment common to both body halves were defined. The volunteers were photographed in a standardized manner. Photogrammetric measurements were performed by three independent observers using the three software packages and compared to direct anthropometric measurements made with calipers and a protractor.RESULTS:Measurements obtained with AutoCAD(r) were the most reproducible and those made with ImageTool(r) were the most similar to direct anthropometry, while measurements with Adobe Photoshop(r) showed the largest differences. Except for angular measurements, significant differences were found between measurements of line segments made using the three software packages and those obtained by direct anthropometry.CONCLUSION:AutoCAD(r) provided the highest precision and intermediate accuracy; ImageTool(r) had the highest accuracy and lowest precision; and Adobe Photoshop(r) showed intermediate precision and the worst accuracy among the three software packages.
Keywords Photogrammetry
Body Weights and Measures
Language English
Date 2014-10-01
Published in Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, v. 29, n. 10, p. 688-695, 2014.
ISSN 0102-8650 (Sherpa/Romeo, impact factor)
Publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
Extent 688-695
Access rights Open access Open Access
Type Article
Web of Science ID WOS:000343982100010
SciELO ID S0102-86502014001000688 (statistics in SciELO)

Show full item record


Name: S0102-86502014001000688.pdf
Size: 450.9Kb
Format: PDF
Open file

This item appears in the following Collection(s)




My Account