Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part II

Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part II

Autor Tamanini, Jose Tadeu Nunes Google Scholar
Castro, Renata Cristina de Oliveira Souza Google Scholar
Tamanini, Juliana Milhomem Google Scholar
Feldner Junior, Paulo Cezar Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Instituição Federal University of Sao Carlos Department of Medicine
Health Secretary of Jau Ambulatory of Urogynecology
ABC School of Medicine
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Resumo Objective To compare the effects of two surgical procedures for the correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse (AVWP) on the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) using symptom questionnaires and quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods One hundred women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage (POP-Q) ≥ 2 were randomly distributed in two preoperatory groups. The first group (mesh) (n = 45) received a polypropylene mesh (PM) implant and the control group (n = 55) was submitted to anterior colporraphy with or without synthetic sling. Postoperatory follow-up was done after 12 months. The primary objective was to compare the effect of the surgeries on LUTS using the final scores of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8), as well as the analysis of the incapacitating urinary symptoms and “de novo” urinary symptoms after 12 months of surgery in both groups. Results Although there was a different number of women in each group, randomization was adequate, resulted in homogeneous groups that could be compared regarding socio demographic, clinical and gynecological (POP-Q) variables. Patients of both groups showed improvements regarding LUTS and QoL, whether using polypropylene mesh or not, based on the final scores of the ICIQ-UI SF and OAB-V8 questionnaires after 12-month follow-up. There were few incapacitating and “de novo” urinary symptoms, without any significant statistical difference between both groups after 12 months of surgery. Conclusion There was a general improvement of LUTS and QoL in both groups after 12-month follow-up. However, there was no significant difference of LUTS, as well as the more incapacitating and “de novo” urinary symptoms between both groups after 12 months of surgery.
Palavra-chave Prolapse
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Pelvic Floor Disorders
Idioma Inglês
Data de publicação 2013-07-01
Publicado em International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 39, n. 4, p. 531-541, 2013.
ISSN 1677-5538 (Sherpa/Romeo, fator de impacto)
Publicador Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
Extensão 531-541
Fonte http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.04.11
Direito de acesso Acesso aberto Open Access
Tipo Artigo
Web of Science WOS:000327879200011
SciELO S1677-55382013000400531 (estatísticas na SciELO)
Endereço permanente http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7861

Exibir registro completo




Arquivo

Nome: S1677-55382013000400531.pdf
Tamanho: 198.9KB
Formato: PDF
Descrição:
Abrir arquivo

Este item está nas seguintes coleções

Buscar


Navegar

Minha conta