Interferential electrical stimulation improves peripheral vasodilatation in healthy individuals

Interferential electrical stimulation improves peripheral vasodilatation in healthy individuals

Author Santos, Francisco V. Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Chiappa, Gaspar Rogério da Silva Google Scholar
Vieira, Paulo J. C. Google Scholar
Umpierre, Daniel Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Jorge Pinto Google Scholar
Cipriano Junior, Gerson Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Institution Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Universidade de Brasilia Physical Therapy Department
Abstract BACKGROUND:Interferential electrical stimulation (IES), which may be linked to greater penetration of deep tissue, may restore blood flow by sympathetic nervous modulation; however, studies have found no association between the frequency and duration of the application and blood flow. We hypothesized that 30 min of IES applied to the ganglion stellate region might improve blood flow redistribution.OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of IES on metaboreflex activation in healthy individuals.METHOD:Interferential electrical stimulation or a placebo stimulus (same protocol without electrical output) was applied to the stellate ganglion region in eleven healthy subjects (age 25±1.3 years) prior to exercise. Mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), calf blood flow (CBF) and calf vascular resistance (CVR) were measured throughout exercise protocols (submaximal static handgrip exercise) and with recovery periods with or without postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO+ and PECO -, respectively). Muscle metaboreflex control of calf vascular resistance was estimated by subtracting the area under the curve when circulation was occluded from the area under the curve from the AUC without circulatory occlusion.RESULTS:At peak exercise, increases in mean blood pressure were attenuated by IES (p<0.05), and the effect persisted under both the PECO+ and PECO- treatments. IES promoted higher CBF and lower CVR during exercise and recovery. Likewise, IES induced a reduction in the estimated muscle metaboreflex control (placebo, 21±5 units vs. IES, 6±3, p<0.01).CONCLUSION:Acute application of IES prior to exercise attenuates the increase in blood pressure and vasoconstriction during exercise and metaboreflex activation in healthy subjects.
Keywords neuromodulation
blood flow control
physical therapy
rehabilitation
Language English
Sponsor Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
FIPE-HCPA, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Date 2013-06-01
Published in Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia , v. 17, n. 3, p. 281-288, 2013.
ISSN 1413-3555 (Sherpa/Romeo, impact factor)
Publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
Extent 281-288
Origin http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000092
Access rights Open access Open Access
Type Article
Web of Science ID WOS:000322530900009
SciELO ID S1413-35552013000300281 (statistics in SciELO)
URI http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7822

Show full item record




File

Name: S1413-35552013000300281.pdf
Size: 1.275Mb
Format: PDF
Description:
Open file

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search


Browse

Statistics

My Account