Differences between remaining ability and loss of capacity in maximum aerobic impairment

Differences between remaining ability and loss of capacity in maximum aerobic impairment

Autor Neder, Jose Alberto Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Nery, Luiz Eduardo Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Bagatin, E. Google Scholar
Lucas, Sandra Regina Rodrigues Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Anção, Meide Silva Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Sue, D.y. Google Scholar
Instituição Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Resumo In the evaluation of exercise intolerance of patients with respiratory diseases the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) have proposed similar classifications for rating aerobic impairment using maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) normalized for total body weight (ml min-1 kg-1). However, subjects with the same VO2max weight-corrected values may have considerably different losses of aerobic performance (VO2max expressed as % predicted). We have proposed a new, specific method for rating loss of aerobic capacity (VO2max, % predicted) and we have compared the two classifications in a prospective study involving 75 silicotic claimants. Logistic regression analysis showed that the disagreement between rating systems (higher dysfunction by the AMA/ATS classification) was associated with age >50 years (P<0.005) and overweight (P = 0.04). Interestingly, clinical (dyspnea score) and spirometric (FEV1) normality were only associated with the VO2max, % predicted, normal values (P<0.01); therefore, in older and obese subjects the AMA/ATS classification tended to overestimate the aerobic dysfunction. We conclude that in the evaluation of aerobic impairment in patients with respiratory diseases, the loss of aerobic capacity (VO2max, % predicted) should be used instead of the traditional method (remaining aerobic ability, VO2max, in ml min-1 kg-1).
Palavra-chave disability evaluation
work capacity
exercise tolerance
oxygen consumption
occupational diseases
Idioma Inglês
Data de publicação 1998-05-01
Publicado em Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 31, n. 5, p. 639-646, 1998.
ISSN 0100-879X (Sherpa/Romeo, fator de impacto)
Publicador Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
Extensão 639-646
Fonte http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X1998000500006
Direito de acesso Acesso aberto Open Access
Tipo Artigo
Web of Science WOS:000073802500006
SciELO S0100-879X1998000500006 (estatísticas na SciELO)
Endereço permanente http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/621

Exibir registro completo




Arquivo

Nome: S0100-879X1998000500006.pdf
Tamanho: 258.8KB
Formato: PDF
Descrição:
Abrir arquivo

Este item está nas seguintes coleções

Buscar


Navegar

Minha conta