No difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in activities of daily living and pain: a randomized clinical trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Amaro, Joicemar Tarouco [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Arliani, Gustavo Goncalves [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Astur, Diego Costa [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Debieux, Pedro [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Kaleka, Camila Cohen
dc.contributor.author Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-13T11:53:03Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-13T11:53:03Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4106-1
dc.identifier.citation Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. New York, v. 25, n. 6, p. 1692-1696, 2017.
dc.identifier.issn 0942-2056
dc.identifier.uri https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54371
dc.description.abstract Until now, there are no definitive conclusions regarding functional differences related to middle- and long-term everyday activities and patient pain following implantation of mobile- and fixed-platform tibial prostheses. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are middle-term differences in knee function and pain in patients undergoing fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Eligible patients were randomized into two groups: the first group received TKA implantation with a fixed tibial platform (group A) en
dc.description.abstract the second group received TKA with a mobile tibial platform (group B). Patients were followed up (2 years), and their symptoms and limitations in daily living activities were evaluated using the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS), in addition to pain evaluation assessed using the pain visual analogue scale (VAS). There were no significant differences in function and symptoms in the ADLS and VAS between the study groups. The type of platform used in TKA (fixed vs. mobile) does not change the symptoms, function or pain of patients 2 years post-surgery. Although mobile TKAs may have better short-term results, at medium- and long-term follow-up they do not present important clinical differences compared with fixed-platform TKAs. This information is important so that surgeons can choose the most suitable implant for each patient. Randomized clinical trial, Level I. en
dc.format.extent 1692-1696
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Springer
dc.relation.ispartof Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
dc.rights Acesso restrito
dc.subject Arthroplasty en
dc.subject Replacement en
dc.subject Knee en
dc.subject Pain en
dc.subject Clinical trial en
dc.title No difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in activities of daily living and pain: a randomized clinical trial en
dc.type Artigo
dc.description.affiliation Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Ctr Traumatol Esporte CETE, Dept Ortopedia & Traumatol, Rua Borges Lagoa 783,5 Andar, BR-04038032 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliation Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ortopedia & Traumatol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliation Fac Ciencias Med Santa Casa Sao Paulo, Dept Ortopedia & Traumatol, Grp Joelho, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifesp Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Ctr Traumatol Esporte CETE, Dept Ortopedia & Traumatol, Rua Borges Lagoa 783,5 Andar, BR-04038032 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifesp Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ortopedia & Traumatol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00167-016-4106-1
dc.description.source Web of Science
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000402729500006
dc.coverage New York
dc.citation.volume 25
dc.citation.issue 6



File

File Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

Statistics

My Account