Does the apodized diffractive intraocular lens Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM) interfere with FDT Matrix perimetry results?

Does the apodized diffractive intraocular lens Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM) interfere with FDT Matrix perimetry results?

Alternative title A lente difrativa apodizada Acrysof ReSTOR NaturalTM pode interferir nos resultados da perimetria por FDT Matrix?
Author Bojikian, Karine Duarte Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Vita, Joao Brasil Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Dal Forno, Catia Potira Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Tranjan Neto, Alfredo Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Moura, Christiane Rolim de Autor UNIFESP Google Scholar
Institution Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Abstract Purpose: To compare the effect of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) (Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM)) and its yellow counterpart (Natural IQ (TM)) on frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry results. Methods: This study included 37 eyes from 22 patients at the Centro Oftalmologico Tranjan who had undergone uncomplicated phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (17 Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM), 20 Natural IQ (TM)) performed by the same surgeon, at least three months prior to the study. Patients were subject to frequency doubling technology Matrix Perimeter testing. Results: The patients were between 41 to 79 years old (mean, 70.78 +/- 9.83) in the Natural IQ (TM) and 49 to 81 years old (mean, 67.11 +/- 11.48) in the Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM) group, and the mean IOP was 13.64 +/- 2.02 mmHg in the Natural IQ (TM) 12.94 +/- 1.39 mmHg in the Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM) group. The mean pupillary diameter under scotopic conditions was 6.63 +/- 1.16 mm in the Natural IQ (TM) group and 7.20 +/- 1.8 mm in the Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM) group (p = 0.20). The mean deviation was -1.83 +/- 3.46 dB in the Natural IQ (TM) group and -1.77 +/- 3.94 dB in the Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM) group (p = 0.28). The pattern standard deviation was 3.49 +/- 0.79 dB in the Natural IQ (TM) group and 3.20 +/- 0.86 dB in the Acrysof ReSTOR Natural (TM) group (p = 0.27). Conclusion: There was no difference in the results of FDT Matrix perimetry in eyes that received apodized diffractive IOLs implant or eyes that received monofocal intraocular lens implant.
Keywords Cataract
Lenses, intraocular
Perimetry
Glaucoma
Lens implantation, intraocular
Contrast sensibility
Phacoemulsification
Language English
Date 2009-11-01
Published in Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia. Sao Paulo: Consel Brasil Oftalmologia, v. 72, n. 6, p. 755-759, 2009.
ISSN 0004-2749 (Sherpa/Romeo, impact factor)
Publisher Consel Brasil Oftalmologia
Extent 755-759
Origin http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492009000600003
Access rights Open access Open Access
Type Article
Web of Science ID WOS:000274591700003
SciELO ID S0004-27492009000600003 (statistics in SciELO)
URI http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/42716

Show full item record




File

File Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search


Browse

Statistics

My Account