Transobturator Sling Compared With Single-Incision Mini-Sling for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.author Djehdian, Lucyana M. [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Araujo, Maita P. [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Takano, Claudia C. [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Del-Roy, Carlos A. [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Sartori, Marair G. F. [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Girao, Manoel J. B. C. [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.author Castro, Rodrigo A. [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-24T14:35:24Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-24T14:35:24Z
dc.date.issued 2014-03-01
dc.identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000148
dc.identifier.citation Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 123, n. 3, p. 553-561, 2014.
dc.identifier.issn 0029-7844
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37513
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a single-incision mini-sling compared with a transobturator midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment.METHODS: This prospective single-center randomized controlled trial involved 130 women with a diagnosis of SUI. Primary outcomes were the objective and subjective cure rates, defined as negative cough stress and pad tests, and satisfaction rates. Quality of life assessed by the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form, operation time, complications, and reoperation rates were also recorded. the efficacy was analyzed using a noninferiority test with a margin of 15%. for the noninferiority test, a P value.. 05 rejects the noninferiority hypothesis of the mini-sling.RESULTS: Sixty-four patients in the mini-sling group and 56 in the transobturator group completed the 12-month follow-up. the objective cure rates for the mini-sling and the transobturator sling were 68.1% and 81.9% (absolute difference 13.8; 90% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-26.1; P=.439) and the subjective cure rates were 81.1% and 88.5% (absolute difference 7.4%; 90% CI 2.8-17.6; P=.110), respectively. There was a significant improvement in quality of life in both groups. Thigh pain was greater after the transobturator sling, four patients (7.1%) compared with zero (P=.045). the mean operation time was 5 minutes shorter for the mini-sling procedure (P=.000). Five patients (7.8%) in the mini-sling group and one patient (1.8%) in the transobturator group underwent surgical reintervention for persistent SUI (P=.213).CONCLUSION: the noninferiority of the mini-sling could not be demonstrated in this study at the 12-month follow-up. the mini-sling was associated with shorter operative time and less postoperative thigh pain. en
dc.format.extent 553-561
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartof Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.rights Acesso restrito
dc.title Transobturator Sling Compared With Single-Incision Mini-Sling for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence A Randomized Controlled Trial en
dc.type Artigo
dc.contributor.institution Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.description.affiliation Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Gynecol, Sect Urogynecol & Pelv Surg, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnifesp Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Gynecol, Sect Urogynecol & Pelv Surg, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000148
dc.description.source Web of Science
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000336809100011



Arquivos deste item

Arquivos Tamanho Formato Visualização

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples