Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: A prospective comparative trial

Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: A prospective comparative trial

Autor Souza, C. E. Google Scholar
Muccioli, C. Google Scholar
Soriano, E. S. Google Scholar
Chalita, M. R. Google Scholar
Oliveira, F. Google Scholar
Freitas, L. L. Google Scholar
Meire, L. P. Google Scholar
Tamaki, C. Google Scholar
Belfort, R. Google Scholar
Instituição Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Resumo PURPOSE: Evaluate the visual performance of the AcrySof ReSTOR intraocular lens (IOL) and compare it with the monofocal SA60AT IOL.DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, clinical trial.METHODS: Forty patients (80 eyes) from the Federal University of São Paulo were enrolled in two groups. Twenty-five patients were assigned to the ReSTOR group and 15 patients to the monofocal group. Inclusion criteria were corneal astigmatism < 1.0 diopter, potential acuity meter > 0.2 logMAR units, and no associated ocular diseases. Parameters analyzed included distance uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, near uncork rected and distance corrected visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart), stereopsis (Titmus test), reading speed, wavefront measurement (LADARWave aberrometer), and a quality-of-life questionnaire.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Distance and near uncorrected and best distance corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and reading speed.RESULTS: Distance uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity in the ReSTOR group were not statistically different from the monofocal group (P = .66). Near uncorrected and distance corrected visual acuity were statistically better in the ReSTOR group than the monofocal group (0.16 +/- 0.13 vs 0.62 +/- 0.09, P < .001, and 0.14 +/- 0.12 vs 0.62 +/- 0.07, P < .001, respectively). the ReSTOR group demonstrated less spherical aberrations compared with the monofocal group (P < .001). Monocular photopic contrast sensitivity was statistically lower in the ReSTOR group (P < .001). Stereopsis and reading speed were not statistically different between the groups.CONCLUSION: the AcrySof ReSTOR IOL provides a satisfactory full range of vision and achieves a more satisfactory quality of life when compared with the monofocal SA60AT IOL, but with lower contrast sensitivity.
Idioma Inglês
Data de publicação 2006-05-01
Publicado em American Journal of Ophthalmology. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 141, n. 5, p. 827-832, 2006.
ISSN 0002-9394 (Sherpa/Romeo, fator de impacto)
Publicador Elsevier B.V.
Extensão 827-832
Fonte http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.031
Direito de acesso Acesso restrito
Tipo Artigo
Web of Science WOS:000237598300004
Endereço permanente http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28880

Exibir registro completo




Arquivo

Arquivo Tamanho Formato Visualização

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.

Este item está nas seguintes coleções

Buscar


Navegar

Minha conta